• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Help Desk
  • My Account

OPA - Oil Painters of America

Dedicated to the preservation of representational art

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission, Policies & Bylaws
    • Board of Directors
    • Presidential History
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • History
    • OPA Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Membership Services
    • Member Login
    • Membership Information
    • State & Province Distribution For Regionals
    • Update Member Information
    • Membership Directory
    • Contact Membership Department
  • Events
    • Exhibitions
    • Online Showcase
    • Lunch and Learn
    • Virtual Museum Road Trip
    • Paint Outs
  • Resources
    • Brushstrokes Newsletters
    • Ship and Insure Info
    • Lunch & Learn Video Archives
    • Museum Road Trip Video Archives
  • Services
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Scholarships
    • Critique Services
    • Workshops
    • Have A HeART Humanitarian Award
  • Online Store
  • Awardees
  • Blog
    • OPA Guest Bloggers
    • Blogger’s Agreement (PDF)
    • Comment Policy
    • Advertisement Opportunities
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Hannah Apps

Figure Painting Techniques for Trees

Hannah Apps · Jul 15, 2019 · Leave a Comment

I painted my first tree at age 12 and continued to paint landscapes for the next few decades.  But I have never liked my trees.  Eventually, I switched to figurative work although I love plein air painting.  I still do not like my trees.  I agonize about painting trees.  Give me a portrait to paint, no problem.   But I lose my confidence when it comes to trees. 

I recently read an article by C.J. Trent about blocks faced by all sorts of creative people. Trent wrote that blocks happen for many reasons, including that “you may face an impasse because you need to learn a technique or change your method, or find a new material to realize your vision.”  This common sense view aligned with  Edgar Payne’s advice:  “a painter needs to study, mediate, experiment, and practice interminably.”  This past January, I decided to spend a year studying how to paint trees and painting trees.  I give myself a “B” for effort and a “C” for results.  I still have half the year to go, so I am cautiously optimistic. 

For the study part, I gathered all my books on landscaping painting and turned to John Carlson who devoted a whole chapter to painting trees.  He says it takes study and time and counsels the student to first understand trees, then to draw them, before attempting to paint them.  That works for me. 

I have listened to some very thoughtful people speak about painting trees.  At a gathering of local artists one evening, an artist remarked that it was easy to draw trees as symbols rather than as living creatures.  Only by really seeing them can you draw them so they look real.  It reminded me of the difference between stick figures and more realistic figure drawing.  Trees are not symmetrical; they should have the same feel of gesture as a figure.  A friend mentioned to me that drawing branches should be like drawing fingers on a figure.   Carlson instructed artists that a painter can paint her trees anyway she wants and that the less they look like anyone else’s the happier she should be.   

For the practice part, I have been drawing trees and painting trees.  I have worked on value, color, gesture, and structure.  What have I learned?

Brushwork counts.  A flick of a brush yields the suggestion of leaves dancing in the wind.  Branches need to taper and turn as they snake through the sky, calling for confident brushwork.  Trees call for a balance between abstraction and realism; detail and suggestion.  And I have learned that Carlson is right.  Painting trees is as individual as painting figures.

“Belgium Woods” by Kathy Nolan Hutchins

A friend of mine, Kathy Nolan Hutchins, paints beautiful trees and forests.  She exalts in detail and creates a sense of peace and beauty in her work.  For example, look at her piece, “Belgium Woods.” 

 I would recognize her trees anywhere. 

In contrast, so many of the early great landscape artists, like Ruisdael, only suggested detail in their trees.  Their spare use of color and value gives an illusion of detail and depth. These early artists excelled at creating atmosphere.  I can study these painters for hours. 

Jacob van Ruisdael (Dutch, c. 1628/1629 – 1682), Forest Scene, c. 1655, oil on canvas,
Widener Collection 1942.9.80

I have read lots of rules about painting trees.   I am not much of a rule person so they are fun to read but I am not going to follow them blindly.  I think the only “rule” that I follow is to make my own greens instead of using color straight out of the tube.  I have painted trees that I like.  For instance, I painted our boathouse which is on a beach surrounded by a thick stand of trees.   Most of the trees in this picture are just suggested.

Trees are majestic but the landscape paintings I like the best rarely show an entire tree painted in a realistic fashion.  Instead, trees create the mood of the painting.  So while I think trees need to be painted in a way that shows life and rhyme, I do not want to paint them so realistically that they capture the landscape painting.  Instead, to me, trees are magic; in themselves, and in paintings.   

“Boathouse” by Hannah Apps
Oil on Panel

References:

Edgar Payne, Composition of Outdoor Painting, 1941.

John Carlson,  Carlson’s Guide to Landscape Painting, Dover, 1973.C. J. Trent, ”Breaking through the Block,” Artist’s Magazine, July/August 2019

No Matter What, Paint

Hannah Apps · Sep 10, 2018 · Leave a Comment

Gary
“Gary,” 20” by 24,” Oil on panel

I love to paint most everything but my passion is doing figurative work, especially portraits.
Nothing is more satisfying than to first capture a person’s likeness and then catch at least a glimpse of what I think of as his or her spirit or soul.  I relish that moment where I stand back and realize that I have done what I set out to do.  Sometimes, of course, I fail.  However, I succeed every now and again.
I have been working on a quick portrait study of my son’s girlfriend, Amanda, a woman who does not see herself to be as beautiful as she is.  As I have worked on the painting, I have been thinking about vulnerability and self-confidence.   My goal in this portrait is to show it all:  the beauty, the vulnerability, and the immense spirit that this young woman possesses.  As I paint, I worry that I can’t pull it off.  And thus, arise my own issues of vulnerability and lack of confidence in my own abilities.   I did catch Amanda’s likeness in the underpainting which was done in a rub-out technique on a panel.  I was then able to solidify the likeness as I put more color and dimension on the portrait.  But can I make her spirit shine through?
“I Really Love You, But…….”
“I Really Love You, But…….” 20” by 24,” Oil on panel

I think many artists struggle with these same self-doubts and look in many places to find coping strategies.  I mention a few of my own in hopes that they might resonate with you.
First, I want to continue to learn about techniques and materials.  I graduated from a wonderful comprehensive atelier program that was really focused on drawing skills, techniques and materials.   But, I continue to search for more.  I have found along the way, that for an endeavor as intensely personal and subjective as painting, a staggering number of experts give hard and fast rules dictating what they believe is the only way to successfully paint.
That leads to general questions:  Who do I listen to?  Why should I listen to anyone?   If painting is a way that we artists can express the passions and emotions in our souls and hearts, why should any expert be given the power to tell us how to express ourselves?  For every book I have read on portraiture that stresses that you must know anatomy, there is another one that sets out measurement rules for the length of the head and placement of eyes, etc., not to mention those that use a sculptural approach to narrow down the masses until the portrait emerges.
Underpainting in burnt sienna on a yellow ochre primatura. 12” by 16,” Oil on panel.

So what do I do with all of this conflicting advice and information?  I love learning.  I use many of the techniques at different times depending on my mood and what I am trying to accomplish in a particular painting.  Learning about someone else’s method always yields something new that I can explore and adapt to use in my own work.  But, at the same time, I do not think there is a best way to paint or an only way to paint as long as basic conservation procedures are followed so that the painting will last over time.  I do not find the conflicting advice confusing as much as comforting.  Artists have found so many different ways to communicate their visions.
Block in of flesh tones.

I also study paintings in museums and online.  How does a particular artist paint eyes or lips?  What do they do to make the person’s spirit shine through?  I watch videos and sometimes attend workshops particularly if the artist’s style or technique takes me beyond my comfort level.  Learning is energizing but what I learn is not gospel.  I do think limited palettes lead to color harmony, but I do not always use them.  Sometimes I want to add a color or a lot of colors.  Why not?  Just because pigments were severely limited for the early masters does not mean that we must limit our own choices.  I like starting with a live model and then working from photographs before finishing the painting with the model.  Photographs are great for capturing the likeness but leave a lot to be desired in terms of capturing light and emotion.  But I use photos and I am always glad to have the opportunity to take them.  I like candid shots that show expressions and typically use several photos of the same person to get a sense of their expressions as well as their features.  Some artists say “never work from a photograph.”  I say why not if it helps me achieve my goals for the painting.
Mostly finished portrait sketch

Sometimes I do quick portraits and other times I take my time.  Is there a right way?  Not for me since what I want to do is to reveal emotion.  I think the most important ability for an artist is to be able to draw accurately.  I have to constantly draw to maintain and improve my skill level.  It is a case of use it or lose it.  So where does my self-doubt come from?   Is it from my quest to always get better and the fear that I might not be able to do so?  Is it because I worry that others will not like my work?  Is it that I compare my work to others and find mine lacking?  Is it because every painting can’t be perfect?  Is it because so many people are better artists than me?  Is it because the painting process is satisfying but not always fun?  I think my self-doubt stems from all of the above and much more.
So what do I do about my fears and worries?  I put them aside and I paint.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission, Policies & Bylaws
    • Board of Directors
    • Presidential History
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • History
    • OPA Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Membership Services
    • Member Login
    • Membership Information
    • State & Province Distribution For Regionals
    • Update Member Information
    • Membership Directory
    • Contact Membership Department
  • Events
    • Exhibitions
    • Online Showcase
    • Lunch and Learn
    • Virtual Museum Road Trip
    • Paint Outs
  • Resources
    • Brushstrokes Newsletters
    • Ship and Insure Info
    • Lunch & Learn Video Archives
    • Museum Road Trip Video Archives
  • Services
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Scholarships
    • Critique Services
    • Workshops
    • Have A HeART Humanitarian Award
  • Online Store
  • Awardees
  • Blog
    • OPA Guest Bloggers
    • Blogger’s Agreement (PDF)
    • Comment Policy
    • Advertisement Opportunities

© 2025 OPA - Oil Painters of America · Design by Steck Insights Web Design Logo