• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Help Desk
  • My Account

OPA - Oil Painters of America

Dedicated to the preservation of representational art

  • About
    • Mission, Policies & Bylaws
    • Board of Directors
    • Presidential History
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • History
    • OPA Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Membership Services
    • Member Login
    • Membership Information
    • Update Member Information
    • Membership Directory
    • Contact Membership Department
  • Events
    • Exhibitions
    • Online Showcase
    • Lunch and Learn
    • Paint Outs
    • Workshops
  • Resources
    • Brushstrokes Newsletters
    • Ship and Insure Info
    • Lunch & Learn Video Archives
    • Museum Road Trip Video Archives
  • Services
    • Critique Services
    • Have A HeART Humanitarian Award
  • Sponsorship
  • Scholarships
  • Store
  • Awardees
  • Blog
    • Recent Blogs
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Oil Painting

Suffering from the Green Blues by Christopher Leeper OPA

Christopher Leeper OPA · May 12, 2026 · Leave a Comment

It’s Spring and with that we enter the green season. Green is a tough color for some painters. However, it doesn’t have to be so hard. I try to keep it simple. My color mixing approach is based on the color components of intensity, temperature and value.

Intensity is the purity or brightness of a color. Color temperature ranges from warm to cool. Value is the shade of the color (light, medium or dark). Understanding these three components goes a long way in helping us become efficient color mixers.

Farm in the Hollow, 20×24, oil on board

Let’s make some basic green observations using these three components. Intense greens are ones that scream green. Think of Pthalo Green, Permanent Green Light, Emerald Green, etc. When you see these greens you have no doubt what color family you are looking at. High intensity is usually easy to define. Ask yourself, “Is that color I am trying to match green?” If the answer is obviously yes, then we can assume the intensity is higher. If the answer is not so clear, then the green is somewhat neutralized. Any doubt when identifying a color means something has happened to the base, inherent color. Bright green becomes olive and if we keep moving away from our intense green, we can get an earthy green that could pass for an earth tone. Color temperature is how warm or cool is the green. Simply stated, if it’s warm, we use more yellow in the mix and if it’s cool, more blue.  Value is easy to understand. Is it light, medium or dark green?

The reason I prefer to mix my greens is because I feel like I have total control in coming up with the green to satisfy the three components. With that said there are many great tube greens. I love Sap Green as a shortcut. However, for anyone struggling with green, I advise against relying on tube greens. Tube greens have already decided intensity, temperature and value for you. You then must understand how it fits into your color mixes. This can be tricky. Starting out with just yellow and blue allows you to understand the intensity, temperature and value of your greens.

Here is my approach. Based on the subject, I first create a base green with decent intensity. I like using Cobalt Blue and Cadmium Yellow Lemon. This could also be done with any blue or yellow. The key is that you want this mix to be generally the most intense green in your painting. I put this in the center of my palette. In one direction, I go warmer, more neutral and lighter. The opposite side of the mix is cooler, more neutral and darker. On the warm side add more Cadmium Yellow Lemon, beside it, mix your base green with Cadmium Yellow Medium or Deep. We could also add Yellow Ochre with our base green to get a less intense green. Adding white as we move away will give you lighter and more neutral versions. Going in the other direction, add more Cobalt Blue. You can also mix Cad Yellows with Ultramarine Blue for a darker and less intense green. Adding a bit of cool red like Alizarin Crimson or Quinacridone Red will lower the intensity. If you want something very dark, you can add an earth tone.

One of the keys to using this method on the palette is to keep all your color mixes connected or sliding into one another. That is how nature displays the colors. There is a dizzying amount of variation. Having this variety on your palette will allow you to compare the color with the subject and not stop and mix every time you need a new green. From these base mixes you can add other colors. I like to have other blues available like Pthalo Blue, Sevres Blue and Kings Blue. This is especially helpful in shadow areas. In warmer sections of the painting, I like to add Cadmium Orange, Transparent Orange or Transparent Red Oxide.

This method of color mixing is just one approach. There are countless ways to arrive at the same place. I like it because I am thinking about the components of color as I am mixing. It feels like you end up with a better understanding of the subject. If you are a painter suffering from the green blues, I hope this approach helps.

Here is a step by step that shows the process.

Step 1) Early in the painting, I am not trying to be exact on the greens. I am focused on the composition shapes and value arrangement. However, the basic green mix described in the article have all the variety that I need.
Step 2) After the composition is stated, more specific color is painted focusing on intensity, temperature and value. This is when the color mixes described in this article really help.
Step 3) As the painting progresses, the color is adjusted and the final shapes, edges and details are added. This step is where I will often add other colors to the original green mixes. I keep these mixes to the sides but always connected to the main mix.
Step 4) Final painting: Aqua Verde 16×20, oil on board

Demo: The Falls by Albert Handell OPAM

Albert Handell · Apr 5, 2026 · Leave a Comment

The Falls – oil – 24×30

I paint with both Oils and Pastel … For a while there I was better known for my pastel. I was part of the pastel rebirth which started in the late 1960s. A lot of artists work with me in my Pastel and Oil workshops, and I start my oil workshops by pointing out “The nice thing about Oils is that they are wet, the problem with Oils is that they are wet”.

I like my Oils to be wet but at the right time… not at the very beginning. I have developed a technique using GAMSOL…sparingly and scrubbing the colors onto my canvas literally spreading them out so they are both transparent and quick drying. Then I go to the center   of interest…or the most striking value contrasting area…establish it and…and paint from that area out.

Working with minimal Gamsol, I establish some large shapes.

Using different colors, I scrub the paint on so that those areas dry quickly and transparently instead of opaque.

Then I focus in on the most important area which are the waterfalls

Painting out and close to completion with a slight suggestion of the background area above the waterfalls…please note how beautifully green suggestion of leaves stands out from the transparent background. The leaves were painted with my favorite palette knife.

FINISH…. All the parts are established…certain areas are transparent and were not touched from the initial block in. And other areas ARE strong CONTRASTING OPAQUE AREAS PAINTED WITH a loaded brush…AND PALETTE KNIFE.

Then comes some softening of areas that could be very subtle. Lost and Found edges are all very important for giving a sense of space…making sure you have not lost any of the carrying power.

I turn the painting to the wall…leave the studio have a cup of coffee. Then when I go back to the studio, I take a few steps away from the painting…turn it around and see how strong the carrying power is.

Additional Paintings

Spring Mist by Albert Handell – oil – 2024

I have enjoyed painting the mist floating around in many of my paintings especially with my oils and here is a wonderful example

Mystery Light by Albert Handell – oil – 22×26
Mystery Light by Albert Handel – oil – 22×26

The Adobe colors with the blue doors and trim, (the blue keeps the devil out).

The blues and the Adobe colors couldn’t be more compatible.

The Adobe colors during the purples of winter and the dark summer greens… under all sorts of lighting conditions and seasons. For many years I couldn’t get enough of them and I painted them in both mediums. When I was in Woodstock NY…1970 to 19831 got involved with trees, rockfaces, streams etc. Then, I wouldn’t paint them in the summer for there was just too much green. SO I started in November and painted many trees during the winters.

Magnificent Trees – oil – 18×24
Forest Rhythms – oil – 18×24

“One Step Back, Two Steps Forward”

Antwan Ramar OPA · Feb 10, 2026 · Leave a Comment

After not having as much time to paint last year as I would have liked due to some home renovations, I came back to the easel feeling out of shape, like my painting process took a step backwards.

While I find there are some aspects of painting that weaken quickly when we stray from our daily practice, there are also a few benefits. I am not a proponent of prolonged breaks, but if they happen, one of the things that slips, along with your familiarity and confidence in your process, are the “bad” habits, or the “habits that are no longer serving your vision”. Over the years that we train our mind and body for painting, that conditioning is not always discretionary. We soak up tips and tricks as we grow, and before we know it we’re using them all the time, they become defining characteristics of our “style”. There’s nothing inherently wrong with this, but it’s important to remember how much good painting is objective observation through our own aesthetic glasses. So, the idea of “bad” habits is just prescribing a method, without truly diagnosing it first.

I see growing as cleaning the lens of these glasses, giving you a little more clarity as you continue to polish the rough edges. So, when you take a break, it’s a way to step back and make sure you have the right prescription.

This speaks to the idea that we can only grow our skills to the extent of our aesthetic taste, or understanding. Some people call this the “hand catching up to the eye”. So, when you come back to the easel after a period of time, your eye has continued to advance its taste and aspiration, but the hand has atrophied.  Your hand is remembering how to paint, but it’s not quite as automatic: you take an extra second before you mix that color or pull that familiar stroke. You double check and reassess with new eyes.

For me this process began last year when I stepped away for almost 6 months. When I came back, nothing was feeling quite right. I had a fairly clear idea of what I was looking to achieve in my paintings when I first put paint to canvas, but by the time they were finished, I felt like my habits had betrayed me and I ended up with tired lifeless paintings that were more concerned with “being right” (in terms of copying the reference) and less with making good expressive art.

So, after a summer of plein air painting and struggling to align my old habits and formulas with my new refined visual goals, I decided to set out on a body of work that would advance previously done paintings or subjects that ignited a creative spark, and could be refined further.

I also saw this as an opportunity to take a more exploratory and, at the same time, methodical approach to my process.

Some paintings, like this one, were plein air pieces that had an ineffable charm that deserved more attention. I did this 12×24 painting in Sonoma, CA last year. When I started it, the light was fading fast, and I knew I was only going to get an hour or so to capture it. I began with “the feeling”…which was atmospheric, weathered and full of lovely texture. The barn shapes were so simple and bold the scene lent itself to a strong, immediate painting method. After an hour and a half, this is what I had. This painting had a much lower render than what I usually try to produce en plein air. But I felt I had successfully captured the scene with my initial impression.

This painting sold quickly and I did not have very much time to enjoy or study it myself…a lucrative tragedy I accept.

This fall when I decided to explore some of these “paintings that got away”, I gave each one a limited palette color gamut for harmony and simplicity partly because I felt my work was suffering from a slight identity crisis: I usually pride myself on accurate color true to my subject, but then contradict that by trying to exaggerate/enhance mood and drama of the scene. When I think about my inspirations, “realistic” color is pretty low on my list of aspirations for my own work. So, by limiting those options I was able to liberate my process a little more to think about the qualities that really matter to me in my paintings, like mood, design, and mark-making. For this painting I felt like these colors would give me everything I needed to achieve the harmonious goal I had in mind. Most of the paintings I have done in this series have a three-color palette plus white. Transparent red oxide was an addition here to help with some warm darks. Before you ask: No, I don’t exclusively use water mixable oils. I often (as in this case) don’t even add any water to the process. I just had these in the bin and felt the colors would be fitting.

When I started planning this series I went through references and plein air paintings that had a “certain something” and came up with 14 images I wanted to refine. I first did a few scribble thumbnails to explore composition options and get in the ballpark of what the final painting might “feel” like. I then did small postcard value comps in gouache to clarify the design a bit more.

Continuing to shift compositional hierarchy I started to explore the color harmony of this universe, furthering my understanding and giving me yet a little more freedom and confidence for the final painting.

After all these studies I went back to my reference and made notes, mission statements of sorts, of the qualities and their hierarchies I wanted to be legible in the finished painting.

I hung this list next to my easel and glanced at it from time to time throughout the process to make sure I didn’t go astray in the name of vanity. Sometimes we get so smitten with how proficiently we can “render” a passage of paint, we forget to ask if we should. These distractions often become the extras in your movie, wearing a clown nose, walking behind your lead movie star in the climactic scene.  –  I, for one, have to watch out for these.

“Stable passage” 15×30, oil on canvas.

This is my final painting that continued to evolve and ultimately achieved the vision I might not have seen, but “felt” from its conception. Along with other benefits, the preparatory work gave me the freedom to really lay the paint on thick. Utilizing mark-making techniques that provide the viewer food for thought beyond the literal and pictorial representation.

I share this as my own personal journey in painting this year, hoping it might inspire you to take risks and try something new, to challenge your habits and continue to advance your foresight through insight.

see more of Antwan’s work at Insta: @antwan.ramar Web: www.AntwanRamar.com

Cheater, Cheater

Suzie Baker · Jan 15, 2026 · 13 Comments

Suzie Baker OPA – Board Member – Past President

Ferdinand Hodler, The Disappointed Souls, 1892, 120x299cm, Guggenheim Museum, New York – Public Domain, Wikimedia Commons

Names and offending images have been omitted to protect the not-so-innocent.

Oh, the cheaters we’ve seen over the years…this painting by Ferdinand Hodler illustrates so well the feeling we on the OPA Board have every time we have to address a fresh incident of cheating.

From the outset, let’s be clear: this article is not intended as a sensational exposé. Rather, it is an acknowledgment that Oil Painters of America, like any organization committed to excellence, occasionally encounters rule violations—and that we take seriously our responsibility to address them.

Across more than three decades as an organization and hundreds of exhibitions and online shows, OPA has found that such incidents are rare, but persistent—perhaps a handful a year. Addressing them thoughtfully and consistently allows us to maintain the integrity, fairness, and high standards that our members and exhibiting artists expect.

Sometimes Rule Violations Are Unintentional

We recognize that not all rule violations are intentional. Mistakes are made. OPA’s submission rules are detailed, and artists sometimes assume they understand them without reviewing the prospectus upon entering.

We strongly encourage all artists entering OPA exhibitions to carefully review our submission rules:

OPA Submission Rules

Questions are always welcome. Our knowledgeable staff regularly assists artists who want clarification before entering. For example, members often ask whether paintings created in non-instructional portrait or figure groups qualify as original concept and design and are eligible for entry. (They are!) Reaching out beforehand allows artists to enter with confidence and peace of mind.

When Rules Must Be Clarified

As technology evolves, so must our policies. Occasionally, new situations require clearer language or additional guidance.

Most of us have encountered product warnings that seem obvious—until we remember that they exist because someone, somewhere, tried something ill-advised. On irons: “Do not iron clothes while wearing them” On strollers: “Remove child before folding” On sun shields: “Do not drive with sun shield in place.”

In much the same way, OPA periodically updates or clarifies its rules to address misunderstandings, questionable practices, and most recently, clarifications regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI).

While these updates can feel tedious, they serve an important purpose: protecting artists who work honestly and ensuring a level playing field for everyone. OPA’s mission remains unchanged—to uphold excellence in representational oil painting

The OPA Rules & Bylaws

This recently clarified section of the OPA Rules and Bylaws now reads:

“Only original paintings are acceptable for entry into OPA Exhibitions. They must be created by hand solely by the artist submitting the painting and be original in concept and design. Grounds for disqualification of a painting include the following:

A. Use of Artificial Intelligence to generate a design or create the facsimile of a painting.

B. Copying from photos or images that were not created by the artist, including stock images, historic photos, or of any reference to which the artist does not hold total copyright. Purchased reference material that transfers copyright to the artist is unacceptable.

C. Use of digital, photo, or other mechanical transference to the substrate of an image. The artist must draw and/or paint the image on the substrate themselves.

D. Entry of a painting created in a paid instructional setting such as a workshop or art class.

E. Entry of an image of a painting that does not represent the artist’s final and completed artwork.”

Find the full prospectus for the Thirty-fifth Annual National Juried Exhibition of Traditional Oils here.

Interested in a deeper dive into the OPA Mission, Policies, and Bylaws? Pour yourself a warm drink, get comfy, and find them here.

Caravaggio, The Cardsharps, 94.2×130.9 cm, 1594, Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth – Public Domain, Wikimedia Commons

Sometimes Cheaters are Intentional

Here is a list of the most common infractions we have encountered over the years. (If any of these elicit a strong reaction, know that the Board and staff share it.)

1. Printed Images Presented as Paintings

On rare occasions, photographic or digital images are printed on canvas and enhanced with paint. These works are typically identified during installation by museum or gallery staff or by a Board member prior to an opening and are removed from the exhibition.

2. Digitally Created Work Submitted as Oil Painting

With the growth of digital tools and AI, this issue has become more common. OPA addresses this through juror education, detection software, and a secondary review of accepted works.

While some organizations are looking to require each submission to include a “work-in-progress” image to accompany each entry, we have decided this is too burdensome to institute for the vast number of honorable entrants. Instead, moving forward, when artists enter their images, they are required to check a box affirming their compliance with our rules, and their willingness to provide us with process photos or other evidence of authorship if it is requested.

3. Copies of Other Artists’ Work

Master copies and close study of influential artists have long been an important part of artistic training. Recreating a painting for educational purposes can be invaluable in developing skills and visual understanding.

However, work submitted to OPA exhibitions must be the original concept and design of the submitting artist. Inspiration differs fundamentally from replication. From time to time, OPA encounters paintings that closely mirror an existing work by another artist. This may include work that is substantially similar, paintings that appear to be reversed versions of known works, or replicates another work too closely to be considered original.

4. Use of Copyrighted Reference Material

OPA has encountered works based on identifiable copyrighted characters or images. As our rules state, references must be wholly owned by the artist; purchased or licensed materials are not acceptable.

Pere Borrell del Caso, Escaping Criticism, 1874, 75.7 x 61cm,  Collection of the Bank of Spain, Madrid – Public Domain, Wikimedia Commons

How Cheaters Are Typically Discovered

●     Tip-offs (anonymous or otherwise)

The number one way cheaters are caught? Other artists. Creating an excellent oil painting takes effort, and when artists see someone trying to cut corners, they speak up.

●     Direct observation

Every painting is viewed by a juror (or five) and a judge. Physical paintings get shipped to shows and are handled by museum or gallery staff. Attending Board members are often the first to peruse a show. Every link in that chain is an opportunity to check the authenticity of a piece.

●     Detection Software

Entries are subject to AI detection software. If an entry is questionable, or is due for an award, it will be given extra scrutiny.

●     Communication Between Organizations

OPA communicates with the leaders of other arts organizations. It’s really a small world in that regard. If applicable, when someone gets caught by one group, the others are quietly notified in the interest of our shared standards. A note here: to date, it is not our practice to publicly name names. We hope to keep it that way.

Vincent van Gogh, Old Man in Sorrow (On the Threshold of Eternity), 1890, 81x65cm, Kröller-Müller Museum, Otterlo, Netherlands – Public Domain, Wikimedia Commons

The Consequences

When a concern is substantiated, OPA follows a formal review process. If a piece is found questionable, the artist is notified and given the opportunity to provide clarification or documentation.

These situations are handled with discretion and care. Consequences may include removal from exhibitions, revocation of awards, and changes in membership status, in accordance with OPA policies.

Recent bylaw updates (listed below) now allow for stronger responses in cases involving knowing and flagrant violations, ensuring fairness for the broader membership.

“II. An artist who submits an entry in contravention of these requirements is subject to disqualification from exhibiting in any OPA exhibition for two years.

III. The Board of Directors shall have the authority, by a vote of no less than two-thirds (2/3) of the Board, to terminate the membership of any individual whose actions, submissions, or representations are found to be in flagrant or willful violation of these rules or whose conduct is deemed contrary to the aims and integrity of Oil Painters of America. Grounds for such action include, but are not limited to:

A. Submission of artwork that is misrepresented as an original oil painting, including works partially or wholly generated by artificial intelligence or digital manipulation.

B. Repeated or deliberate violations of OPA’s exhibition rules or ethical standards.

C. Conduct that undermines the reputation or mission of the organization.

Prior to removal, the member shall be notified in writing of the alleged violation and given a 30-day window of opportunity to respond. The Board’s decision shall be final. Such expulsion will result in forfeiture of membership dues, competition entry fees, any award related to the misrepresentation and revocation of any OPA and OPAM Signature designations. If applicable, the painting will be mailed back at the artist’s expense.”

Jacques-Louis David, Oath of the Horatii, 1784-75, 329.8×424.8cm, Musée du Louvre, Paris – Public Domain, Wikimedia Commons

Upholding Our Standards—Together

Oil Painters of America exists to champion excellence in representational oil painting. We believe artists are best served when the standards are clear, consistently applied, and fairly enforced.

If something in an exhibition gives pause, we welcome thoughtful communication. Occasionally, what appears questionable is simply the result of extraordinary skill and dedication. Other times, it brings an important issue to our attention.

We are better together.

The Deadline Is Coming. Are You Ready?

James Bruce Jr. OPAM · Dec 9, 2025 · 1 Comment

This article was written by long-serving Board member and Master Signature artist James Bruce Jr., (January 1938 – December 2020). It is reprinted from our archives and outlines the methods and criteria the OPA jury uses to select paintings for the National Juried Exhibition. We hope it helps you select your best work to enter into this year’s show. See you in Steamboat Springs! 

The deadline I’m referring to is the last date to enter OPA’s competition, 35th National Juried Exhibition of Traditional Oils to be hosted by Steamboat Art Museum, Steamboat Springs, Colorado. The focus in the jurying process will be to select paintings which show the highest quality in draftsmanship, color and composition, emphasizing a diversity in representational style and subject matter. Entries must be received no later than Friday, March 6, 2026.

Each year OPA receives approximately 1,900 entries and jurors must carefully choose approximately 200 paintings to be included in the exhibition. As always, the goal is to assemble the finest display of representational oil paintings.

This annual national competition is one of the most important endeavors of the OPA mission to promote representational painting. Awards for this annual competition total approximately $100,000, including a $25,000 Best in Show, so there is good reason to enter. That said, every artist entering should understand the jurying process and what criteria is used to determine the paintings that are included in the competition.

OPA selects a jurying committee comprised of 5 OPA members. Three are Signature members of OPA and two are Master Signature members. The make-up of the committee is different for each exhibition and jurors do not know who else is jurying with them. The Jurying Chair always attempts to get jurors that represent a variety of painting styles and that are located in different parts of the country. Jurors are asked to use the criteria below in making their selections.

  • Is there a dominant value?
  • Is there a dominant harmony?
  • Is there a clear center of interest?
  • Is there balance?
  • Do the shapes and lines lead the eyes to focal points within the picture plane?
  • Is the drawing accurate?
  • Are the value relationships convincing?
  • Are the color temperature relationships consistent and believable?
  • Is there an appropriate variety of hard and soft edges?
  • Is the paint application varied and interesting?

III. Expression/Idea:
Does the painting’s intent or execution demonstrate a unique, compelling or worthwhile idea?

There are two rounds of jurying. For the first round, jurors are asked to evaluate each painting and assign it a “yes” or “no” vote. Yes means that the juror believes that the painting meets some or all of the criteria and warrants a second, more critical evaluation.

The second round is usually comprised of approximately 600 – 700 paintings. In this round, jurors are asked to vote using a scale of 1 to 7. It is important that jurors are consistent and use the following scoring system when making their selections.

  • One represents a painting that is weak in all or almost all of the above.
  • Two represents a painting that is weak in most areas.
  • Three represents a painting that may be competent in a few areas but, overall, is aweak painting.
  • Four represents a painting that displays knowledge of the fundamentals but overallis mediocre.
  • Five represents a painting that is competently handled in most areas.
  • Six represents a painting that is skillfully executed in almost all areas.
  • Seven represents a painting that is outstanding and is skillfully executed in virtually every area. These are the top 1-3% of entries for this show.

 Summary:

  • Very Weak
  • Weak
  • Some Competence
  • Average
  • Competent (top 15 – 25% of entries)
  • Excellent (top 10% of entries)
  • Outstanding (top 1– 3% of entries)

After the jurors have completed voting, the scores are tabulated and artists receiving the most points will be accepted into the exhibition. Only one (1) painting may be accepted.

Again, the last date for you to enter is Friday, March 6, 2026. I hope that you will enter the annual competition. Your painting cannot be selected if you don’t enter, so do so starting November 1, 2025, and use the criteria that the jurors will use to select your entry. Present your very best painting. Follow the entry rules and use the criteria the jurors will be using to judge your painting against the best paintings entered into the competition. And best wishes to each member of OPA. The competition is stiff but it is worth the effort to participate by submitting your entries before the deadline!

Respectfully,

James Bruce Jr. OPAM

In Memoriam
(January 17, 1938 – December 25, 2020)

James W Bruce Jr. began pursuing art at age 14. He was a Master Signature member of Oil Painters of America and believed that art competitions organized by OPA provide wonderful opportunities to learn and grow. In September 2016, Bruce and Scott Christensen had a two-person exhibition in the Patrons’ Gallery at the Salmagundi Club in New York City. In addition to his love of painting, Bruce pursued a significant career in banking. After retiring from Banks of Mid-America, the largest banking company in Oklahoma, he acquired controlling interest in American Bank Systems. He was also a member of the Board of Directors of American Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa, Oklahoma and InvesTrust of Oklahoma City. He served on boards of the University of Oklahoma and Oklahoma City University, Canterbury Voices, and Oklahoma Arts Institute. In 2006, Governor Brad Henry awarded him one of the prestigious Governor’s Arts Award. A retrospective of 25 of his paintings was held in the Governor’s Gallery at the State Capitol in recognition of this award. James tirelessly gave his time and expertise to Oil Painters of America, serving on the Board for over ten years.

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 81
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

  • About
    • Mission, Policies & Bylaws
    • Board of Directors
    • Presidential History
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • History
    • OPA Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Membership Services
    • Member Login
    • Membership Information
    • Update Member Information
    • Membership Directory
    • Contact Membership Department
  • Events
    • Exhibitions
    • Online Showcase
    • Lunch and Learn
    • Paint Outs
    • Workshops
  • Resources
    • Brushstrokes Newsletters
    • Ship and Insure Info
    • Lunch & Learn Video Archives
    • Museum Road Trip Video Archives
  • Services
    • Critique Services
    • Have A HeART Humanitarian Award
  • Sponsorship
  • Scholarships
  • Store
  • Awardees
  • Blog
    • Recent Blogs

© 2026 OPA - Oil Painters of America · Design by Steck Insights Web Design Logo