• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Help Desk
  • My Account

OPA - Oil Painters of America

Dedicated to the preservation of representational art

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission, Policies & Bylaws
    • Board of Directors
    • Presidential History
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • History
    • OPA Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Membership Services
    • Member Login
    • Membership Information
    • State & Province Distribution For Regionals
    • Update Member Information
    • Membership Directory
    • Contact Membership Department
  • Events
    • Exhibitions
    • Online Showcase
    • Lunch and Learn
    • Virtual Museum Road Trip
    • Paint Outs
  • Resources
    • Brushstrokes Newsletters
    • Ship and Insure Info
    • Lunch & Learn Video Archives
    • Museum Road Trip Video Archives
  • Services
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Scholarships
    • Critique Services
    • Workshops
    • Have A HeART Humanitarian Award
  • Online Store
  • Awardees
  • Blog
    • OPA Guest Bloggers
    • Blogger’s Agreement (PDF)
    • Comment Policy
    • Advertisement Opportunities
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Subjects

How to Prepare a Winning Portfolio

Oil Painters of America · Dec 2, 2013 · 1 Comment

Interview notes by Elizabeth Robbins

Panel of Three of Scottsdale’s Finest Gallery Directors
Artists eagerly poured into the lecture room to hear what Scott Eubanks (Gallery Russia), Scott Jones (Legacy Gallery), and Beth Lauterback (Scottsdale Fine Art Gallery) had to say about Portfolios and getting into galleries.

Elizabeth_Robbins_Scott_Eubanks_Scott_Jones_and_Beth_Lauterbach_OPAIn our modern age of new methods for presenting our paintings; this group of experts gave us a window into their world of submission expectations.
Galleries are swamped with submissions, so artists, do your homework! Find out if the gallery that you desire to be in actually is a good fit for you and your work. For example: Legacy Gallery averages 248 submissions per month. Unfortunately, 95% of these submissions have no idea what kind of work Legacy Gallery sells. Match your subject matter, your pricing and your style to the kind of work that the gallery actually exhibits. Then, be a salesman, sell yourself to that gallery.
Be considerate of the gallery. Don’t walk into a gallery without an appointment and expect them to drop everything and look at your work. Use a portfolio to present your work. The type of portfolio doesn’t matter, digital or print portfolio, although all three of these galleries prefer e-mail portfolios. Whether you show a variety of subjects or just one, your portfolio of images is as good as the worst piece shown. Be sure to show only your best. Galleries are first looking for standout art, and secondly, your bio, good shows, publications in magazines, and competitions. Likewise, they are disappointed if only one piece is strong. They will be looking at your work to see if you consistently produce good quality art that sells. Need they remind you, they are in the business of selling paintings? Their wall space is valuable and they need to move art. It doesn’t matter if you can paint in all mediums and many subjects. In your portfolio, if you do offer them a single medium and a single focus, it is easier for them to see how your work will fit into the gallery. It will tell them if and how they can sell your work.
Be sure to check each gallery for their specific format for submission then stick to those guidelines. It is not about the packaging of the portfolio; it is all about informing the gallery of your best qualities, such as:
Education: Whom did you study with and with what program.
Web site: This gives your work a presence and links to the gallery. In no way should you work in competition with the gallery for sales. Your web site should work jointly with the gallery to create sales for you. Be a partner with your galleries, include links to their web sites.
Competitions: Only include the big shows, not the small shows (no county fair awards, please) and especially not the shows that you entered but were not accepted.
Publications: Articles are great, but not necessary if your work is strong. If you get an article or two, excellent, but in the meantime, put out press releases on your work and your awards.
Images of Paintings: Show only your best paintings with a variety of compositions that will exhibit your strong points.
Personal Rapport: Any gallery that is considering bringing you into their stable of artists needs to feel comfortable about working with you. Are you easy to work with, forward thinking, and creating your own opportunities in your career path? Don’t tell a gallery that you are better than “so and so”. That is not the way to approach a gallery.
Timing: Remember they reminded us, that timing is everything and lots of exposure helps the odds. Put yourself out there every way that you can, magazines, shows, awards, web sites, Facebook, Blog, etc.  They will notice you.  Show them your best painting. Catch their attention. Let them be the judge of what they can and cannot sell. They each have their own client base and know what will and won’t sell in their market.
Rejection: Okay, so you have been rejected from a gallery, pick your self up and try another one. You don’t want to be in a gallery that isn’t excited about your work.

“Galleries often work together sharing information. If your work is not right for their gallery they may recommend you to another gallery that is a better fit.  You can also ask the gallery that has rejected you, if there is a gallery that would be a better fit for your work.”


Question : In the midst of this staggering economy, is this a good time to apply to galleries, or should artists wait until the economy strengthens?
Answer: Do it now. Many galleries are looking for fresh ideas to grab the patron’s eye and pocket book. This may be the time that galleries are replacing or adding new artists.
Question: Do you look at all the submissions?
Answer: Scott Jones, of Legacy gallery, says he looks at everyone’s submission and their websites. He looks for that magical quality that grabs him. Scott did admit that after 3 years of looking at the submissions for the Legacy gallery, only two submissions got into the gallery. This last comment created quite a stir in the audience. A wave of discouragement could be felt throughout the room. However, Scott reminded us that he and the other galleries are always looking at many sources for their artists. He has a list of 109 favorite artists that he is secretly watching and always looking for more artists to add to the list. He regularly checks out their web sites and links that those artists have to other artist’s web sites. That is how he finds other artists. It is easy for him to surf the web looking for new and exciting work. He loves Blogs, but not Blogs or websites that are not updates regularly. He watches artists mentioning other artists. It is a wonderful way to find new painters. Other recommendations: Newsletters: example – Clint Watson’s newsletter – one artist vouches for another. That goes a long way. Contests: i.e. win a Ray Mar Contest. Scott is a huge fan of OPA. It gives artists tremendous exposure. He asked 7 artists at the OPA show to be in Legacy Gallery.
Question: Typically how many paintings do the galleries want from artists coming into their gallery?
Answer: Scott Eubanks- six paintings to start off, four paintings to be hung and two more in the back. Beth Lauterbach answered, six paintings plus good photography of each painting. To create a good connection with her clients she also requires a good contemporary biography (don’t dig too deep into your past) and a good photo of the artist.
All three Galleries agreed:

  • Do keep sending submissions to galleries
  • Keep your web sites current. Only show your best work. Take off your older paintings.
  • Enter shows. Win awards
  • Get exposure from many sources: Magazines, Facebook, Blogs, Newsletters.
  • Don’t get discouraged.
  • Look for galleries compatible with your work.
  • Persevere. Keep putting it out there
  • Seek a gallery that is wild about your art, they need to fall in love with it.
  • Seek a gallery that is run or owned by someone you can trust and is enjoyable.

One of the tough jobs being an artist is that you must find people that share your love of subject matter and style. You must be successful both at painting and also at finding those people that love what you paint.
In closing, for those artists already in galleries, these three galleries all had final words of wisdom!
Question: What if an artist is doing all of the above, but the public isn’t buying his/her paintings?
Answer: Here are some points that Scott Eubanks gave us to consider why art doesn’t sell (besides the poor economy):

  • The painting is not as good as originally thought.
  • It is over priced. What is the actual track record for that artist’s work.
  • Same subject over and over
  • Bad choice of subject matter.
  • All the paintings from one artist look alike.
  • Perhaps the gallery that your work is currently in, but not selling, is not helping you sell the art. Perhaps the gallery itself doesn’t have enough exposure.
Solution:

  • Work your craft, perfect your skills. Climb to new heights.
  • Carefully consider your price and increases based on performance.
  • Choose subject matter that appeals to the clients in your galleries.
  • Find your uniqueness, build excitement in each painting.
  • If your gallery isn’t a good fit and you are not selling, look for another gallery that is a good fit for your paintings and you.
  • Don’t ever compete with your galleries, they are your business partners. Take good care of them.
  • Connect your work to your galleries.
  • Take your older paintings out of your current galleries and replace them with uplifting paintings. Scott Jones called them “Prozac Art”. There is enough stress in everyone’s lives, people are needing and buying peaceful, pretty art that soothes their minds and souls.

Most of all, Beth Lauterbach concluded, “What you do well, continue to do well. If you are selling, keep doing it”.
We all left the room inspired!

Perception

Mr. John Hulsey · Nov 4, 2013 · 2 Comments

We are currently reading two fascinating books about human development and the evolution of art: The Social Conquest of Earth by E. O. Wilson and The Age of Insight: The Quest to Understand the Unconscious in Art, Mind, and Brain, from Vienna 1900 to the Present by Eric R. Kandel. While each author offers different but mutually supportive discussions on the rise of perception, self image and cultural myth-making, they are both sharing with us different aspects of the latest scientific discoveries in the fields of human development and cognition.
Mystics have told us for centuries that what most of us experience as life is an illusion. They assert that we do not see life as it is. Rather, we impose our biased interpretations on everything that touches us and that our particular, personal vision guides our actions and reactions.
Recent research by cognitive scientists has also determined that our brains are wired to deduce general, global patterns from whatever limited, local information we can gather and then to try to form a reliable, predictive pattern or picture of the world from which we can operate. This ability to think in the abstract is a sign of higher intelligence, and is at the very root of art-making. Furthermore, we each tend to assign high value to those random events which seem to support a view or pattern which pleases us and a low value to everything else. In essence, we are seeing through personal-colored lenses.
Because the whole is too large for us to see well normally, we have evolved to operate with this illusion of certainty, each forming our own unique view of the world. Our deviations from each other’s views may be slight, or they may be great. We all accept and share certain facts about the largest phenomena in common, like gravity, the seasons, orbits of the planets, and so on. However, there are an innumerable amount of details about the world that we individually may not agree upon, that are open to interpretation. Enter the Shaman, the mystic and the artist.

"Moon Road" by John Hulsey
“Moon Road” by John Hulsey
"Queen of Snows" by John Hulsey
“Queen of Snows” by John Hulsey
"Morning Meadow" by John Hulsey
“Morning Meadow” by John Hulsey

So, if life is partly an illusion, what does that mean for the visual artist? Number one is good news – since everyone has a slightly different perception of the world, each artist, by definition, must create unique work. The trick is to be able to thoroughly tune in to and assign high value to one’s perceptions about the world, and then have the courage to express that unique view in one’s art.
Surprisingly, it is also ambiguity that makes great art. A certain amount of ambiguity in an image allows viewers to participate in the artist’s world-view while simultaneously imposing their own interpretations. Mr. Kandel writes, “The meaning of the image depends on each viewer’s associations and knowledge of the world and of art, and the ability to recall that knowledge and bring it to bear on the particular image.”
When looking at art, our brains are using our pattern-making architecture and our memory to extrapolate familiar, personal associations from the image, and in a sense make it part of our own experience. In this way, great art always possesses the potential to become a unique experience for each person.

Bryce Cameron Liston Interview

Mr. John Pototschnik · Oct 7, 2013 · 4 Comments

“Being an artist and painting the human figure is what compels me. It wakes me up at night, it’s what I love and I drive myself to do it very well. Art is my lifelong obsession, pleasure, and torment.”

One thing I have learned about Bryce Liston during this interview process…he’s a very professional, dedicated, and responsible artist. But why should I be surprised? Except for a short time at the University of Utah, he has directed his own educational path. It’s been a path of very focused, hard, persistent work, and he believes that the lack of formal art education actually helped him discover his “voice”.
Freed from the influence of the so-called “sophisticated voices” of college art departments, that tend to scorn illustration, or anything representational for that matter, Liston fell in love with the works of Pyle, Wyeth, Rockwell, and others. These great illustrators of the past proved to be instructive and immensely inspirational.
Liston knows what it takes to succeed in this business, but he also knows it takes more than just hard work. In a recent blog posting, he closed with a quote from Edgar Payne, “Great patience is called for on the hard path that I have entered on.”
I’m pleased to bring you this wonderfully informative interview with Bryce Cameron Liston.

Bryce Cameron Liston
Bryce Cameron Liston

Why are you a figure painter?
Great figurative art is an enduring depiction of the human experience. The human form completely inspires me. People are beautiful, mysterious, ever changing and completely individual.
I grew up looking at the wonderful art of the great illustrators, like Howard Pyle, N.C. Wyeth, Frank Frazetta and Norman Rockwell. In school I spent hundreds of hours pouring over the images created by those great artists. I guess that’s not such a great thing to be doing in math class…maybe that’s why I never “got” math. I think back to those wonderful and powerful Frazetta paintings, and how he painted the human form. His characters were alive, dramatic and VERY sexy– it really stimulated my imagination. I’ve been focusing on the human form ever since.
“Rain” – 24″x 18″ – Oil
“Rain” – 24″x 18″ – Oil

What training did you receive in order to pursue your career?
I have had little to no official training. I’ve gathered information and training in my own manner. Growing up in a rural area of Utah in the 70’s and 80’s, resources and financial backing were very limited for me. So with that facing me, the local university seemed to be my best option. Boy was I disappointed! It only took a little over a year to decide it was not the right fit for me. I wanted to learn about the craft of art. I wanted to learn to actually produce art, not just discuss it. I wish I could have found some solid training back then, but can you imagine finding about far flung art schools without any internet and very little money? My only connection to the art world at that time was an institution that had no patience for traditional art. And then, I was fortunate enough to find a world class sculptor living in my area that needed some help in his foundry. So I spent 15 years working for sculptor Edward J. Fraughton. Ed was very liberal with his advice in the arts. Many times it felt more like I was in a school than a foundry. I learned a lot about anatomy, gesture, line and composition, not to mention being on the receiving end of some great lessons in art history. It’s funny, I learned about painting from a sculptor- I don’t think that’s something that happens every day. Obviously for painting there were certain gaps, such as color, value and edge. Since my time in the foundry I have worked very diligently to increase my skill up in those areas.
So, you really don’t think you received sufficient training to be an artist?
No, not even close. I continue to learn every year, every week, every painting. It’s what drives me. Degas said it best I think…on his death bed it is reported he said, “Damn and just when I was starting to get it.”
“Sweetness and Light” – 16″x 12″ – Oil
“Sweetness and Light” – 16″x 12″ – Oil

Knowledge and procedure

Does one need to have a thorough knowledge of anatomy to be a good figure painter?
I live by and teach this quote by Robert Beverly Hale: “First you draw what you see. Next, you draw what you know, and only then, will know what it is that you see”. It’s a brilliant statement; it’s stated so simply, but behind those words lie a lifetime of study for anyone. So yes, anatomy is very, important. In fact, coming at art partially through sculpture, anatomy is paramount. The sculptor works with form first (anatomy), and he knows his form is correct by the way the light falls on it. The painter approaches it in almost the opposite direction (albeit a complementary one). And that is, he paints the light and when he gets the effects of the light accurate, the form will read correctly.
How much of your work is done from life?
I have always worked from life, be it drawing, painting or sculpture. I continue to work from life each week as many times as my schedule will permit. But I must admit that I’m not the fastest painter. So in order to obtain the finish needed in much of my work I also need to use photographic reference. Many of my paintings are a collaboration of both life work and photo reference. My studio is also my place away from the world, it’s my refuge. I would find it difficult if I had to share all this time with a model.
What’s the key thing you’re trying to capture when painting the figure?
I guess it depends on what my particular subject is and how I’m feeling at the time. Many times it’s just the desire to turn the form. That is, making something look three-dimensional on a two-dimensional surface. It’s that sculptor in me I guess. I love the lines of the figure, especially the female figure, and trying to capture the subtle lines and gestures in a figure can be extremely challenging.

“Can Spring be Far”
“Can Spring be Far” – 21″x 28″ – Oil
“The Winter’s Tale” – 24″x 30″ – Oil
“The Winter’s Tale” – 24″x 30″ – Oil

Is the popularity of the female form in art throughout history a result of artist’s being predominately male…or is there another reason?
I certainly think that aspect can’t be ignored, but it is certainly much more than that. I enjoy working with the simple beauty and the elegant flowing lines of the female form. There is certainly a sensuality and grace to the form; it’s beautiful and lovely in so many, never ending ways. It’s interesting that most of my female artist friends agree that they also enjoy working primarily with the female figure.

Working with the model

When setting up the model, what is the main thing you’re after?
Line and gesture are always at the forefront of my thoughts. Shapes come in next along with the lighting.
How do you typically select and work with your models and how are they compensated?
Beyond using my family members, the selection and use of models, quite often is a hit and miss game. I like to work with someone outside of my studio first, that is, in an open group of artists. That way I get to know the person first before inviting them into my personal space. Personality is so very important; I have to enjoy working around the person. And as far as compensation, it’s typically an hourly rate.

“Lotus” – 16″x 20″ – Oil
“Lotus” – 16″x 20″ – Oil
“Study for Le Jardin"
“Study for Le Jardin”
“Solitude’s Echo” – 18″x 24″ – Oil
“Solitude’s Echo” – 18″x 24″ – Oil

It’s one thing to capture a likeness, it’s another to capture one’s inner character, how is that accomplished?
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been working on a piece and felt like it looks very much like the model, but I can see it’s technically a bit off, so I proceed to “fix it”. In the end I know that it’s technically correct, but now it no longer looks exactly like the model. I believe the painter is painting the person’s essence, their spirit if you will. I don’t know exactly how it happens; it just kind of sneaks in there when you’re not looking. That is one reason an artist’s portrait far exceeds a photograph.
Describe your working procedure.
I seem to approach nearly every painting a bit differently. I keep thinking maybe someday I’ll do it the same way each time. But the more I learn about myself the more I realize this is the way I’m wired. I guess it’s a way of keeping things fresh. Sometimes I start with a drawing of the subject or figure. I like having a drawing to refer back to in case the painting gets out of whack. But many times I just start drawing on the linen.
Beyond all of that, I first look for the overall design, flow and placement of the subject matter. A strong design is the foundation of any great painting. After I feel I have a good start with the design I start looking at the light. I ask myself what temperature is it? What direction is it coming from and what is the intensity? The light unifies all the elements in the painting. It gives the painting its mood.

The Process

Figure, Sketch
Figure, Block-in
Figure, Complete Block-in
Figure, Paint Layers

 
“Repose” 16″x 24″ – Oil (Completed Painting)
“Repose” 16″x 24″ – Oil (Completed Painting)

How thorough is your initial drawing?
It depends on how complex the painting is. On a simple painting I will only indicate the drawing with simple geometric shapes. If I’m working out a more complex painting I can spend days working on the drawings.
What colors are most often found on your palette?
Titanium white, flake white, cad yellow lt, cad orange, cad red lt, perylene red, quinacridone violet (mostly I mix those two together to make a very good permanent alizarin crimson), ultramarine blue, viridian, turquoise blue, yellow ochre, raw umber, ivory black. This is a general overall list of colors I typically use; I don’t always have all of these colors out. Many times I will limit my palette or simplify it depending on what I’m painting.

Perseverance and painting what you love

How does one find their individuality as an artist?
I think in this day and age that can be a bit difficult. I mean, the whole planet is at our fingertips instantly. We can look at nearly every style and approach by nearly any artist anywhere in the world from any time period. It’s easy to maybe lose yourself in there somewhere. It’s important to ask yourself, what excites you? What type of scenes enliven and motivate you?
Do you experience dry spells, where everything seems to be a struggle? If so, why do you think that is?
Yes, it actually happens quite often for me. I have determined it can be caused by several different factors. The first is plain and simply overworking. I don’t mean overworking an individual painting (that happens too, but it’s a by product) I mean too many hours and too many deadlines back to back. The artist’s mind needs time away, time to think, rejuvenate and just experiment. I guess the saying fits “all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy”.

“The Light from Within”
“The Light from Within” – 12″x 9″ – Oil

Landscape has been the most salable subject for years, do you see that changing?
I don’t see that changing. In fact with the huge popularity of plein-air painting right now I see landscapes becoming even more popular. I think it takes a gutsier collector to buy figurative art, and of course people who purchase nudes, are even more so. Figurative art tends to make a statement; it’s more personal. Landscapes are simply more accepted, more passive. I have been told by some people they don’t collect paintings of people because they don’t want someone they don’t know in their home. But really, when most of us think of great artists of the past…and the greatest of all work…what and who comes to mind first? Velasquez, Rembrandt, Vermeer, Titian, Michelangelo, Courbet, Sargent, Sorolla, Repin, Fechin..etc. are all at the top of the list. Great figurative art is an enduring depiction of the human experience.

Influences and wise advice

What advice would you have for a young artist/painter?
DRAW, DRAW, DRAW! Paint and draw all the time. Do it now! Do not wait. Do not think you have a lifetime because it takes your whole life to figure it out. It’s about mileage and pushing yourself to grow and learn. Learn while you’re young, you learn more efficiently. So do it now and don’t ever let anyone tell you that you can’t be an artist! Your doubt and your fear are truly your greatest enemies.
What advice would you have for a first-time collector?
Collect from your heart. Collect art that speaks to you; you’ll know it when it does. You’ll feel that little twinge in your gut when you see that painting across the gallery, and it makes your pulse quicken and calls you over for a closer look. Those are the paintings to add to your collection.
If you could spend the day with any three artists, past or present, who would, they be?
This can be a daunting question. When choosing an artist from the past I always wonder if you should take their personality into the equation. I mean, I would love to spend the day with Sargent, Zorn or even Sorolla, but I believe they wouldn’t have much time or patience with me or anyone else asking a bunch of questions. They seemed to be men with large egos, larger than life and in certain circumstances perhaps not the nicest people. But that’s a big part of what made them great artists. I do know a little bit about Norman Rockwell and I’m pretty sure a day spent with him would be very enjoyable, smoking a pipe or two and learning a lot to boot. As far as artists alive today, I would love to have some time with Zhang Wen Xin. He’s a Chinese artist that lived in the U.S. from 1987 to 2005. When he was in the U.S he would make his way up to Salt Lake City from Taos to teach workshops in the summer. I did manage to take part in some of his workshops, many, many years ago. But I look back now and realize that nearly everything I saw and that he said went way over my head. If I had the same chance now, I think I might be able to grasp a little of his genius.
You asked for three artists, so I will throw in John William Waterhouse. He is one of my all time favorites and I believe he was a humble and sincere man. I would love to know more about his process and thinking behind his paintings…but really, just the chance to watch him work…priceless!

“Life in Bloom”
“Life in Bloom” – 16″x 20″ – Oil

If you were stranded on an island, which three books would you want with you?
Well first off I would want the U.S. military survival guide. Because I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t have the ability to make coconut and banana cream pies like Marianne. Beyond that I guess just about anything by John Steinbeck. Or perhaps the Lord of the Rings trilogy would be nice. On the other hand perhaps that would be a good time to try to take in War and Peace or Moby Dick.
Who has had the greatest influence on your career, and why?
Again, I would credit those illustrators I mentioned above. But perhaps the reason I was so interested in those artists to begin with was because I grew up around art. My Mother was an artist and art was always prevalent in the house. I always had the smell of turpentine, oil paint and varnish in my house and oil paints in the freezer—I mean, didn’t everyone?;-). Many times I would go out with her and her friends while they painted plein air.  Although at the time it bored me to tears, I think it must have planted a seed in my subconscious. Looking back I remember how bored I was, you know kids like to be around other kids, and these were…well…OLD people! I realize now (with a smile) that many of them were probably younger than I am now.
“An Aura of Fragrances”
“An Aura of Fragrances” – 28″x 22″ – Oil

What does it take to become a successful artist?
I think that‘s very individualistic. We’ve all had a completely different set of experiences and input. Some start early in life, some later. Some of us have families to support. Some artists have had great teachers or schools, and fortunately we all want something different out of art. But beyond all of that, it takes persistence. I think when you’re starting out it really helps to have support; support of family, friends, teachers and the current education system. Try to find your own voice, but don’t worry too much about that in the beginning. Just get your skills up.
How do you know when a painting is finished?
Probably about three or four hours before I think it is.
If you could begin all over again, knowing what you know now, what would you do differently in developing your career?
Wow, that’s a loaded question. If I dwell on it too much I start down that uncomfortable road of resentment. But I guess the first thing is, I would NOT listen to anyone who told me I could not be and artist, ranging from my family to the school system. I would have found a way to attend an art school or move to an area that had a great teacher, and I would have worked a LOT harder when I was young even if I had no money.
How many hours do you typically paint per day?
It can range from 2 to 14. But I prefer to paint about 6 hours per day. I find much beyond that I get a diminished return. But deadlines and pressure from galleries can make for some very long days. People who think it’s easy to be an artist should try it for themselves. Forcing the creative spirit to be there when you need it can be very challenging
 
Many thanks Bryce for submitting to this interview, and thank you for contributing such beautiful work to this world.

The Artist and their environment

Bill Farnsworth · Jun 24, 2013 · 9 Comments

"Hanging With Albin" by Bill Farnsworth OPA
“Hanging With Albin” by Bill Farnsworth OPA
Artists have long been influenced by their surroundings.
California artist’s paint mostly California scenes and so on. But that is just the surface layer in what makes us who we are. For me, family is first , and if all is well on the home front, all will be well in the studio. Working out of my house all those years as an illustrator kept me in close contact with my family, so I knew most of the time what my kids were up to and put out the daily fires that spring up when you are working out of your home. I love to cook so at the end of a hopefully good day in the studio, I’ll pour a drink and start prepping dinner. The process of switching from a brush to a spatula is relaxing and is great time to wind down. Food is such a great part of life that if we treat it only as fuel, we are missing out. Cooking, like art has core principals, and if you learn those principals, wonderful things can happen. My wife Debbie is a Kindergarten Teacher, so she comes home wiped out and in need to talk with an adult and I need to talk to anybody but the dogs. We have created a home we both really love and it is a place of sanctuary. Our neighbors and friends come over for Potluck dinners once a week. Living in Florida has allowed us to live outside year round and working for myself was a great way to work at another passion, my back yard. During a couple of good illustration years I starting putting patios, Tiki bar, fountains and an outdoor fireplace. Building the fireplace was an extension of my creative energy.
"In The Bowl" by Bill Farnsworth OPA
“In The Bowl” by Bill Farnsworth OPA
"Dash of Light" by Bill Farnsworth OPA
“Dash of Light” by Bill Farnsworth OPA
It also became a big meeting place for family and friends. I think these elements family, friends, cooking and building things have made me a better artist. The balance act artists have to juggle in order to survive is different with all of us, but I think we all have to be aware of not just what’s in our studio but what surrounds us.
As artist’s, we are sensitive to our environment and usually shows itself in our paintings. Some move to locals that inspire them and start creating the best art of their lives. For many of us moving is not feasible, but we can make our studio and home a place that inspires. My wife understands that her five year old students, who are starting school for the first time, need to feel safe and happy in order to learn. If our environment is one that inspires and makes us happy it will show in the art we produce. Collectors buy art that makes their lives better and are in essence buying a piece of who we are. I don’t want to sugar coat our careers as artists because it is very difficult, but I am reminded of a school talk I did years ago and at the end of my show a little boy asked me “so you get to stay home and color all day?” Yes, yes I do.

Classical (Classic) Realism- Part 1

Mr. John Pototschnik · May 27, 2013 · Leave a Comment

A three-part series that highlights the origins and resurgence of Classic Realism and its importance to the 21st century artist.

Michael John Angel - Lamberto (Study) 11.75 x 13.75 Mixed Media
Michael John Angel – Lamberto (Study) 11.75 x 13.75 Mixed Media
It was in college that I decided to become an artist. How to achieve that goal, well, I assumed the college knew. In my ignorance, I knew very little about what it took to become an artist, nor did I even know what questions to ask.
The 1960’s did not give a young student many options, so I took the logical, affordable one. For me, growing as an artist followed the path of trial and error with some influential and valuable guidance along the way. Mainly, however, I feel I am mostly self-taught. At one point in my career, I probably considered that a badge of honor, but not anymore. Now I consider it a shame and a powerful condemnation of the sad state of art education during my formative years.
Juliette Aristides – Family - 24″x 18″ – Charcoal and sepia on toned paper
Juliette Aristides – Family – 24″x 18″ – Charcoal and sepia on toned paper
Today, with the rise of so many great educational opportunities for artists, from workshops to ateliers, things are much different. Tastes in art are changing. Hopeful students are looking for something more than the self-indulgent painting of the modernist era…those works preferred and promoted by art critics and museums for almost 100 years.
There are now art schools around the world, many in this country, that are intent on researching and restoring the teaching methods of old that produced the world’s greatest artists.
We really owe a great deal of gratitude to those who are dedicating themselves to teaching these traditional methods, for we’re already seeing the phenomenal results of such training among many of our younger artists.
David Hardy – Carla (Study) – 25″x 19″ – Charcoal and chalk
David Hardy – Carla (Study) – 25″x 19″ – Charcoal and chalk
I am so excited to bring you this 3-part interview with three of the best, all recognized living masters who have dedicated themselves to training the next generation of artists. It should be noted that my timing proved to be the worst as they were contacted just as Fall classes were about to begin. For some, my request was too much to deal with…and I totally understand. But for these three…well, what can I say but…Thank You.
In the interview that follows, my hope is that we gain a deeper understanding of what some are calling “Classical Realism”. What is it and what are it’s roots? What distinguishes classical training from other types of art instruction, and why is it important?
I think you will find this three-part interview very enlightening.
 

Michael John Angel

Michael John Angel
Michael John Angel
Michael John Angel was born in England but emigrated to Canada during his teen years. Searching for a teacher that would give him the training he craved, in the late 1960’s he found what he was looking for in Florence, Italy. Now recognized as one of the foremost traditional painters in North America, he is founder and director of Angel Academies of Art in both Canada and Italy. He has dedicated himself to not only passing on his love for classical and traditional art, but also to instilling the disciplines that lead to successful mastery of the necessary techniques.
 

Juliette Aristides

Juliette Aristides
Juliette Aristides
Juliette Aristides is the founding instructor of the Aristides Atelier at Gage Academy in Seattle, WA. and also Aristides Atelier, an on-line teaching website. A prolific writer, she has authored three books: “The Classical Drawing Atelier”, “The Classical Painting Atelier”, and “Lessons in Classical Drawing”. She believes that the goal of learning to draw and paint is attainable by anyone who is willing to pursue it. It is as accessible as learning to write or play a musical instrument. She has dedicated herself to helping others attain that goal.
 

David Hardy

David Hardy
David Hardy
David Hardy began his studies with Dallas artist, Ramon Froman, at the age of nineteen. Later he continued his studies at the American Academy of Fine Art in Chicago and the Art Students League in New York. The Atelier School of Classical Realism in the San Francisco Bay area, which David founded, focuses its attention on the marvelous range of technical artistic knowledge, understanding and observation of nature that helped make possible the impressive accomplishments of the masters of realism.
 

Interview

“Classically trained” and “classical realism” are terms often bandied about by fine artists today. What exactly is meant by those terms?

Juliette AristidesAristides: Classical Realism was a term coined by Richard Lack. On the surface it looks like a contradiction of terms. Realism often refers to an unfiltered view of everyday life. Classism works within a tradition striving for an ideal between nature and design. I imagine the term Classical Realism reflects the striving of an artist to see and express the ideal in life. I love this definition of classism from an unlikely source, the Romantic artist, Eugene Delacroix: “I would readily apply the term “classical” to all well-ordered works which satisfy the mind, not only by an accurate, noble, or lively rendering of sentiments and objects, but also by their unity and logical arrangements. In short, by all those qualities which enhance the impression by creating a final simplicity.”
David HardyHardy: The terms “Classically trained” and “Classical Realism” vary in meaning in the art community because there is a wide range of understanding and cultural sophistication amongst some of those using these terms. I choose to name my atelier the Atelier School of Classical Realism for two reasons: (1) Atelier because I have adapted some of the teaching approaches and concepts popular in Paris in the 19th century. Atelier (French for ‘studio’) studies brought a limited (small) group of students together to learn from a respected master. (2) I firmly believe, with but a few later exceptions, that the major Baroque artists brought realism to a level rarely touched since. Because of this, I have made the effort to become very involved with Baroque technology. When I think of classical realism, I think of Old Master baroque artists, such as Rembrandt, Vermeer, Hals, Reubens, Van Dyke, Carravagio and Velasquez.
Michael John AngelAngel: I hate to start off by being pedantic, but “Classical Realism” is actually a misnomer: the adjective Classical specifically refers to things from the Classical period in Greece (c.480 to 323 BC), and classical (lower-case C) refers more generally to things to do with Greece and ancient Rome. Classic Realism is better, or Traditional Realism. A classic shoe is just that, whereas a classical shoe is a sandal. The only classical painting that we have is vase painting. Realism is a difficult word, too, implying as it does things that we see in reality, i.e. everyday genre painting. This would exclude all symbolic allegory, including mythology, Christian or pagan. It also tends to exclude Conceptualism, but more about this later. I prefer Representational Painting (or Sculpture, of course), but it’s something of a mouthful. (Another much misused word is figurative. It actually means representational: a still life or a landscape are figurative, as are figural works such as nudes and portraits.) Sorry to go on, but you did ask!!

What characteristics are synonymous among all things classical?

Juliette AristidesAristides: It was said very well by the artist and author Kenyon Cox, in his book The Classic point of view (1911): “The Classic Spirit is the disinterested search for perfection; it is the love of clearness and reasonableness and self-control; it is, above all, the love of permanence and of continuity. It asks of a work of art, not that it shall be novel or effective, but that it shall be fine and noble. It seeks not merely to express individuality or emotion but to express disciplined emotion and individuality restrained by law. It strives for the essential rather than the accidental, the eternal rather than the momentary – loves impersonality more than personality, and feels more power in the orderly succession of the hours and the seasons than in the violence of earthquake or of storm.”
David HardyHardy: When I think of classical things, I think of search for truth, search for the ultimate in ideals, plus clarity and accessibility.

Why do we credit and accept the Greeks as establishing the canons of beauty?

Juliette AristidesAristides: Greek art, in the Classical period, reached a remarkable balance between adherence to proportional cannons and naturalism. The Greeks moved away from static proportional systems, identifying and formalizing the attributes of beauty from nature. When looking at images from an art history timeline, you can see the Greeks so surpassed their predecessors in sophistication that the culture almost appears to spring up out of thin air.
Michael John AngelHardy: Because they were there “firstest with the mostest”.

Why the fascination with ancient Greece and Rome?

Juliette AristidesAristides: In his book Civilization, Kenneth Clark wrote that “Western Europe had inherited an ideal invented in Greece in the 5th century B.C which was so satisfying to the mind and eye that it lasted practically unchanged for over six-hundred years”. During my travels this summer it is easy to see its powerful influence in America – in old city Philadelphia. It not only affected Europe, but when the New World was being shaped our founding fathers looked all the way back to Greco-Roman times, not only as a model for democracy, but also to their arts and architecture. It was the high point in philosophy, art, architecture, civic life, mathematics, etc and became the basis for Western Culture. The ancient Greeks were seeking after permanence and a perfect balance of reason, beauty and justice. They were trying to create a model civilization, not just copying what came before them…but innovating. Perhaps we are drawn to the best of those ideals.
David HardyHardy: Because most of the ideals and structure of western society today were fermented and given birth in ancient Greece and Rome.

Is the fascination with Greek and Roman antiquity concerned mainly with appearances or does it also extend to the philosophies of that time?

David HardyHardy: The almost exclusive survival of Greek art has been their statues. Greek statuary was an expression of their belief that all of their pantheon of gods existed as super perfect versions of humans…more handsome or beautiful, perfectly proportioned, more graceful.
Juliette AristidesAristides: Today, I don’t know that many artists are actually influenced by classical art, and architecture in the strict meaning of the word. Rather, I think there is a desire to understand artistic systems from the past so we can create the best art possible for the times in which we live. I think we are in such a disposable culture, the desire to make something that lasts, that attempts permanence, is compelling. We look back and are inspired to try a little harder.
Mr. Angel has combined these last four questions into the following response:
Michael John AngelAngel: The sculpture of ancient Greece and Rome transcends everyday reality. We feel as though we are looking through the specific – the model, the subject – into the eternal, and this is why it haunts us. How do they accomplish this? All representational art should be a combination of the empirical and the conceptual. Modern ateliers teach the basic geometrical forms – at Angel’s, we teach that there are four pure ones: the cylinder, the egg, the block, and the pyramid, plus the various hybrids between these – and how to render these, illusionistically, on a two-dimensional surface. The ancients stressed these pure forms, modifying them empirically just enough to conjure the appearance of a human, but they leave us with the sense of the Eternal, the perennial flux. They combined this with a profound grasp of gesture, itself a conceptual thing, and of grace, which they created by the use of flow-through lines, rhyming forms and proportion. A great deal of our modern Realism deals only with the empirical, thinking that this is what the masters did; however, if I were to show you a reproduction of a Caravaggio (or a Ribera, or a van Dyck…) and tell you that this is a photo of some models posing, you wouldn’t believe me for a minute. Caravaggio, with or without mirror projections, has changed something; he has conceptualized (simplified and purified) the forms to make them more powerful and, ironically enough, more convincing.

For more on these important artists:
    Michael John Angel
    Angel Academy of Art
    Juliette Aristides
    Aristides Atelier at Gage Academy
    Aristides Atelier
    David Hardy
    Atelier School of Classical Realism
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission, Policies & Bylaws
    • Board of Directors
    • Presidential History
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • History
    • OPA Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Membership Services
    • Member Login
    • Membership Information
    • State & Province Distribution For Regionals
    • Update Member Information
    • Membership Directory
    • Contact Membership Department
  • Events
    • Exhibitions
    • Online Showcase
    • Lunch and Learn
    • Virtual Museum Road Trip
    • Paint Outs
  • Resources
    • Brushstrokes Newsletters
    • Ship and Insure Info
    • Lunch & Learn Video Archives
    • Museum Road Trip Video Archives
  • Services
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Scholarships
    • Critique Services
    • Workshops
    • Have A HeART Humanitarian Award
  • Online Store
  • Awardees
  • Blog
    • OPA Guest Bloggers
    • Blogger’s Agreement (PDF)
    • Comment Policy
    • Advertisement Opportunities

© 2025 OPA - Oil Painters of America · Design by Steck Insights Web Design Logo