• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Help Desk
  • My Account

OPA - Oil Painters of America

Dedicated to the preservation of representational art

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission, Policies & Bylaws
    • Board of Directors
    • Presidential History
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • History
    • OPA Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Membership Services
    • Member Login
    • Membership Information
    • State & Province Distribution For Regionals
    • Update Member Information
    • Membership Directory
    • Contact Membership Department
  • Events
    • Exhibitions
    • Online Showcase
    • Lunch and Learn
    • Virtual Museum Road Trip
    • Paint Outs
  • Resources
    • Brushstrokes Newsletters
    • Ship and Insure Info
    • Lunch & Learn Video Archives
    • Museum Road Trip Video Archives
  • Services
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Scholarships
    • Critique Services
    • Workshops
    • Have A HeART Humanitarian Award
  • Online Store
  • Awardees
  • Blog
    • OPA Guest Bloggers
    • Blogger’s Agreement (PDF)
    • Comment Policy
    • Advertisement Opportunities
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Oil Painting

Artists as Documentarians and Conservationists

Lori Putnam · Jun 20, 2016 · 1 Comment

GH chairs

Landscape and wildlife painters today and throughout history have been responsible for awareness and change as explorers, documentarians, and conservationists. For instance, the idea of our National Parks is largely credited to artists and authors. Our paintings today are just as important as those of the The Hudson River school artists who first shared western views with their world. I recently had an opportunity to share experiences and dialogue surrounding the Oyster Reef Restoration in Apalachicola Bay, Florida.

The Forgotten Coast, a 130 mile stretch of the northwest Florida coastline, begins in Mexico Beach and continues through Port Saint Joe, Carrabelle to St. Mark’s. Little did I know when I began painting the area almost ten years ago, that I could eventually become part of something so worthwhile and spread such an important message through my work. With twists and turns and a vast array of eco-systems, there is such a variety of subjects to paint. I have painted the area on dozens of trips and produced nearly 1000 sketches. At some point I found myself navigating more and more toward Apalachicola Bay and Eastpoint, areas which are known for the best oysters and shrimp you’ll ever eat. Everyone from the New York Times to Field and Stream thinks so! Sure, I enjoyed eating them too, but due to recent environmental and economic strains that have impacted oyster reproduction, I became and more interested in documenting the crises and the plight of Apalachicola Bay.
Buildings, boats, and people connected to the industry have been in my paintings. Many of the structures no longer stand, boats have literally sunk before my eyes, and the men and women no longer work many of the depleted oyster beds.

“Still Standing”
by Lori Putnam
11×14
“Re-Seeding Care Line”
by Lori Putnam
8×16

“Still Standing,” is ironically NOT still standing.

In 2013, I painted “Re-Seeding Care Line,” (private collection), documenting the early morning re-shelling process. For as far as the eye could see, boats lined up to take on a front loader bucket of used shells. Each load was then dumped in a specified location in order to help with the oyster bed restoration. Oyster beds are fragile. They have survived, however, quite well until recent years. Even the area’s hurricanes have typically been just a part of the circle of life. But expanding growth in cities north of the area lead to fresh water being captured and diverted for residential and commercial use well before it had a chance to flow naturally into Florida’s pristine bays. The lack of freshwater flows from the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system has upset the salinity balance. Either there is too much salt, allowing sea creatures and habitat to destroy the beds, or the water is released in a way that does not allow for it to flow naturally and slowly, gathering much-needed nutrients along its way. It then floods the bay, shocking the oysters with fresh water which reduces the balance needed to maintain healthy oyster bars. Replacing oyster cultch by local oystermen each spring for the past four years has been successful, but there is still much work to be done in this area.

"Eastpoint-Blues"
“Eastpoint-Blues”
by Lori Putnam
12×16

Another depiction of the people and their labor, “Eastpoint Blues,” (private collection), was painted during a demonstration from sketches and photographs during the Portrait Society of America Conference in 2014.

Getting an Early Start,” (available), shows the oyster houses and ice house in the small town of Apalachicola as workers begin their day of taking in and processing oysters and shrimp.

These are just a few of the pieces which lead to an Artist-in-Residence program in March of this year. I was invited to get a more personal look at the people whose lives have been most effected by the declining availability of oysters there.

"Getting an Early Start"
“Getting an Early Start”
by Lori Putnam
20×24

The highlight of the program was a day I spent on an oyster boat with Eugene and Delene Millender-King. According to Eugene, he had his wife once filled 5 or 6, 60-pound bags of oysters an hour. Today they are lucky if the get 2-4 in an entire day. Delene sits on the side of the boat, measuring each oyster one by one as Eugene works to tong with the huge, scissors-like tools. Oysters measuring less than 3” are likely male. Those are not to be harvested. Once oysters reach a certain size, they become female.

Illegal catch is another factor that has contributed to the oyster population. Following the closure of such industries as the St. Joe Paper Company, Arizona Chemical and decreased jobs in construction, the slowed economy meant more people began looking for ways to feed their families. Many turned to the fishing industry. Oystering is generational. Many of the oystermen and women’s parents and grand parents were also fishermen. But many younger generation harvesters do not have the same respect for the bays that their ancestors have, resulting in over harvesting. Now, inspections are required. This Spring, every oyster was checked again for size, and there are hefty fines for anyone caught breaking the law.

"His Granny's House"
“His Granny’s House”
by Lori Putnam
8×10

“His Granny’s House,” (available), barely standing along the shore in Eastpoint.

Small, 3-4″ sketches on oil paper were made to provide resource materials needed for larger studio pieces to come. I found out later that one of these small sketches was the home of Delene’s brother and a small blue boat with very high bow was built by her father. The high bow was engineered at Delene’s request, following a near-fatal day when unexpected storms and high seas nearly capsized their boat.

"New Measures"
“New Measures”
by Lori Putnam
8×10

In “New Measures, (private collection), officers and the youth Conservation Corp of the Forgotten Coast are checking bags of oysters and retagging them once they have passed inspection. (The CCFC is part of Franklin’s Promise Coalition, Joe Taylor, Executive Director. A comprehensive youth development program for young adults 18-25 years of age (veterans up to 29, and summer internships for ages beginning at 16 years old) it provides participants with job training, academic programming, leadership skills, and additional support through a strategy of service that conserves, protects and improves the environment, as well as community resilience. This initiative will accomplish an array of specific habitat restoration projects throughout the region such as invasive species removal, living shoreline installation, oyster reef restoration, water quality monitoring, and pine savanna restoration.)

Processing facilities in the area, such as 13-Mile Seafood (named for its location 13-miles along the coastline from Apalachicola), were once bustling with workers washing, bagging, and preparing oysters for transport to restaurants and markets. Over 60% of oysters consumed throughout the southeast (and points beyond) were once trucked from this region. According to Tommy Ward, this company handled more than 250, 60-pound bags a day prior to 2012. Now they average just 25.

"13 Mile Brand"
“13 Mile Brand”
by Lori Putnam
8×10

This sketch, “13-Mile Brand,” (on loan), is the outside of the facility and is just one of many plein air sketches I have made there over the years.

Proposals and solutions are a constant topic. From visitors to restaurant owners; from fishermen to scientists; from engineers to congressmen; many people are working to assist in recovering a healthy balance for this most significant resource. Each entity which whom I spoke had a slightly different take on the issues. Some optimistic; some not so much. The one thing all agreed on is that this is the worst it has ever been. Without fail, everyone I spoke with thanks me for what I am doing, as an artist, to help bring awareness. When I returned to Tennessee to work on studio pieces, I heard their voices and replayed their stories in my mind. In early May, I returned to Eastpoint to present my findings through work produced over the years, during the residency, and in the studio. You could feel a bit of tension in the air during the discussion which followed my presentation. Over and above all of that was the sense of community and togetherness. It was a difficult thing to present knowing that Delene, Eugene and other oystermen were there. We have become friends and I feel close to their families and fellow fishermen.

“A Stark Reality”
by Lori Putnam
24×28
“Raw Bar”
by Lori Putnam
18×24
“Tongin and Cullin”
by Lori Putnam
8×10

The studio painting, “A Stark Reality,” (on loan), has stimulated much discussion while on exhibit at the Eastpoint Visitor’s Center. It, along with other sketches and “Raw Bar,” (private collection), are on loan for an extended period to help continue moving conversations forward. The sketch “Tongin’ and Cullin’” (private collection), was painted while actually sitting on the bow of the boat, was presented as a gift to the Kings as thanks being so amazingly genuine and open during my time on the boat.

The following week, more conservation efforts were also brought to the front of the Forgotten Coast community and visitors who had come for their annual plein air event. I was part of a panel discussion with fellow artists Mary Erickson and John P. Lasater, IV which was moderated by Mr. Jean Stern, Director of the Irvine Museum in California. Mary Erickson offered information from her residency surrounding the ecology and balance of one of the world’s most significant estuaries at St. Joseph Bay State Buffer Preserve, also located in the Forgotten Coast area. Mary’s interest in birds is not only a part of her attraction to this region, it is a part of her life.

"Morning Ritual"
“Morning Ritual”
by Mary Erickson

She purchased the neighboring property to her North Carolina home in 2006, giving her close to 40 acres to oversee. “That fall, an adjacent 130 acres of woods was “harvested” –cut, bulldozed and burned,” states Erickson. “As I sat on the hill overlooking the charred remains, I worried where all of the winter and migrating birds would go. I put up feeders all along the fence line to help the birds that came back to find their food and protective tree cover gone. That was the beginning of an all-consuming work in progress! We now have bird feeders scattered throughout the pastures, trails and woods. We are continually adding nesting boxes, and mow selectively, to give adequate cover and nesting grounds for many different species. We have two year-round ponds and one seasonal wetland, in addition to birdbaths, to provide a bountiful water source. In addition to almost 70 “sight” identified birds, we have deer, raccoon, rabbit, bobcat, possum and fox. Feral cats are trapped and turned in to the local animal rescue. We use pesticides and fertilizer only as a last resort, and then very sparingly, on the property.”
"Erickson’s property in North Carolina"
“Erickson’s property in North Carolina”
by Mary Erickson

Erickson’s property, High Ridge Gardens, is listed on the North Carolina Birding Trail, and is slated to be left as an ongoing artist retreat and bird sanctuary. In addition to Mary’s home, the property holds a 1350 square foot studio and a four bedroom, three bath guest house available to artists, photographers, birders & musicians, and is very affordable for small groups. High Ridge is about 1 hour from Charlotte, NC. Her description says it all, “With canopied country lanes, meandering meadows of green and gold, whisper quiet creeks, and gently rolling hills, the rural villages of Marshville and Peachland boast more fence posts and horses than people. Tucked snuggly away and centrally between interstate highways, it continues to defy time and the temptation to “improve”. Artists come from far and wide to settle, sketch the barns, paint the fields, capture the magic of this area lost in time. There is no traffic, no big box stores, no noise. Horses have the right of way here. I want to leave High Ridge so that people can come here and stay, enjoy morning coffee on the deck of the guest house, watch deer feed along the pond and listen to the song of the birds. Mornings in spring host a cacophony of bird song, and on summer nights we listen to the chorus of frogs, crickets and cicadas. Our dream is to leave the property as an ongoing artists’ retreat and bird sanctuary, long after we need to be here, so that others can enjoy its serene beauty.” “Our talent is a gift, what we do with it is our gift in return” – Mary Erickson

"Twilight's Embrace" by Mary Erickson
“Twilight’s Embrace”
by Mary Erickson
"Summner Sun Over the Illinois" by John P. Lasater, IV
“Summner Sun Over the Illinois”
by John P. Lasater, IV

John Lasater, from Arkansas, shared his Artist-in-Residence experience for his local Illinois River Watershed (of Arkansas and Oklahoma). According to Lasater, “I had a few aims including painting, art education, and exploration, all in the name of building awareness and appreciation.

As an exploration junkie I had a great time finding and painting much of the disregarded vistas and waterways, and as a gift to the area, I built a Google map of my favorite spots. It’s an area of raw beauty, and I continue to encourage its residents to be stewards of it, and to take a part in shaping it.”
“This is a view from our yard in Arkansas, and I’ve never been able to do it justice. After about 5 or 6 outdoor painting sessions on it, I think I’ve expressed one of my most sincere pieces to date. Obviously, it’s not a “magical” time of day. It’s pretty subjectless. The light seemed “silver” to me so I adjusted my palette to make that come across.
Someday I hope to be able to bring many people here to study and enjoy the natural beauty of Arkansas. See more art by John P. Lasater by clicking here

"Silver Light" by John P. Lasater IV
“Silver Light”
by John P. Lasater IV

Additional articles and videos to give you a taste of what is happening in the oyster industry:

  • Apalachicola Bay Oyster Industry Facing Uncertain Future
  • The Disappearing Apalachicola Oyster: Florida’s Fight to Save Its Prized Delicacy
  • Oyster Farming “True Treasures of Apalachicola Bay”
  • The Heritage of Eastpoint – Oyster Harvesting
  • A. L. “Unk” Quick, Oysterman
  • Oystermen and Researchers Fighting for Apalachicola Bay: In the Grass, On the Reef

 
 
 
Images courtesy of the artists.

OPA's 2016 National Juried Exhibition

Oil Painters of America · Jun 6, 2016 · Leave a Comment

Meet the Gold Medal Winners from the 25th National Juried Exhibition

Derek Penix is OPA’s 2016 Salon Show Gold Award Winner for Associate/Signature Division.

Derek Penix Derek Penix was born on December 29, 1980 in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Penix grew up watching members of his family paint but didn’t pursue painting himself until after high school. After trying his hand at painting and selling his first piece he knew this was what he wanted to do for the rest of his life. 
Over the years Penix’s work has changed greatly and continues to evolve with each painting. “I never want to be stuck painting only one way or only one subject matter. Variety is the spice of life and is especially that way for me with painting.”
Penix has had the opportunity to work under Quang Ho and later with C.W. Mundy. “They have helped me as an artist immensely. I am so thankful that they have been willing to feed into my life as they have.”
Penix has been recognized in many national competitions and publications. Even at a young age Penix was recognized in South West Art Magazine’s “21 Under 31” in 2010 and Oklahoma Magazine’s “40 Under 40” in 2014.


Liu Huihan OPAM is OPA’s 2016 Salon Show Gold Award Winner for Master Signature Division.

Huihan LiuLiu, Huihan born in 1952 in Guangzhou China. Huihan graduate from Guangzhou Academy of Fine Art in Oil Painting Department with BA in 1975. He taught in the Art School of Guangzhou Academy of Fine Art in 1979-1985. Huihan was a candidate and was accepted by Graduate school of Guangzhou Academy of Fine Art in 1985. He went to the United State of America to further his study in 1987, graduated from the Graduate School of the Academy of Art College in San Francisco with an M.F.A. in 1989. Huihan taught in the Academy of Art University in San Francisco in 1993-2005. He is a Graduate School Adviser at Academy of Art University.
When he was in China, he had been participated many show exhibitions both in regional and national. Since Huihan has moved to the United States, he has been participating in many national painting shows and invitational exhibitions. His paintings have won many awards and have been collected by both private collectors and museums such as: “Gold Medal for Best Painting” in California Art Club’s 92nd Annual Juried Exhibition; “First Place Winner” 9th Annual Mission San Juan Capistrano Plein Air Painting Event, Wilmington Trust Purchase Collection; “First Place Painting” Plein air exhibition in Bower Museum of Culture Art, Bowers Museum Contemporary Plein air Permanent Collection in Santa Ana ; “Best of Show In Painting-John Scott people’s choice Award” The 25th Western rendezvous of Art, Helena; “Gold Medal for the Master Signature Division at the Oil Painters of America Western Regional Show; “Members’ Choice Award for The Master Signature Division in Oil Painters of America National Exhibition. In 2012, Huihan’s painting “Spring of Miao Village” has been selected by the Organization committee for the Olympic Fine Arts 2012 (London), which was exhibited in London during the 30th Olympic Games in London, was permanent collection by the National Museum in China. Huihan’s work was featured in articles by many leading national artist/collector magazines such as Art of The West; Southwest Art Magazine; The International Artists Magazine and The Artist’ Magazine. Huihan conducts a few invitational painting workshops both in the United States and abroad.
Huihan and his wife Liang, Weizhen are both full time painters live in Kensington in the Bay Area of San Francisco. They both love to travel and have many trips to Tibet, France, Italy, and Taiwan for their painting subjects. His son, Liu Jian graduated in Cornell University in 2008.
Huihan is an Artist Member of Guangdong Artists’ Association China, Master Signature Member of Oil Painters of America, Master Member of American Impressionist Society, an Artist Signature Member of California Art Club, School of Art & Design Guangzhou University Professor in China.

Painting is like Swimming: It’s easy when done right

Rick Delanty · May 23, 2016 · 5 Comments

To float like a cloud, you have to go to the trouble of becoming one.
-Robert Genn, Canadian painter


Island gold
Island Gold
“I’m in the zone!”
“This painting practically painted itself!”
“I found the sweet spot in this one!”
“FINALLY—I didn’t over-work it!”
In artists’ studios all across the English-speaking world, these thoughts are being expressed, either verbally or internally, on a daily basis (and in many other languages in different homelands). Ultimately, painters everywhere want their “work” to be invisible, for their efforts to seem effortless, so that the work looks masterful. The idea is that it would be clear to everyone that the artist has mastered the medium, and not vice versa.
I had the privilege to witness a painting demonstration by the master of portraiture Quang Ho. The block-in unfolded rapidly– the color palette defined the structure initially and efficiently. With every passing moment, the figure on the canvas revealed more and more of the spirit of the seated model, until—finally–Master Ho dashed in the final stroke of blazing white light for the shirt-front, that at once illuminated the face and finished the painting! Gasps from the audience were audible. His was an inspiring display of confidence, knowledge, and skill.
But it doesn’t always work that way. Even professional ballplayers don’t bat a thousand, or hit every three-pointer. Sometimes it’s just a lot of work. What’s the most efficient way to create an effortless—looking painting, despite its complexity?

If people knew how hard I worked to achieve my mastery, it wouldn’t seem so wonderful after all.
–Michelangelo Buonarroti


Mooring at Isthmus Cove
Mooring at Isthmus Cove

Of course, there is no “efficient” way to become a master. Think of well-known artists, actors, musicians, singers, athletes, doctors, teachers… anyone who is accomplished in their vocation. Now say these two words aloud: “overnight…success.”

We both know this is an oxymoron. Anyone who is good and great at what they do has worked long (usually unseen and un-rewarded) hours to get there, to the point where they wanted to be. They had a plan to get there, stayed focused on that plan, and divided and dedicated their available time to implement that plan, despite setbacks, self-doubt, and social judgment. A behind-the-scenes look into their backgrounds would reveal (many) failures to achieve desired goals, disappointments and rejection. But in those personal histories we would also find the will to succeed “no-matter-what.” Mustering self-discipline and courage was Step One on the road to accomplishment and mastery. As artists, we need to decide that we want to work, because we want to learn, experiment, and experience all that we are and who we want to become. As art critic Carter Ratcliff says, “Talent counts for much, but effort counts for more.”

Nobody’s a natural: you work hard to get good, and then you work hard to get better.
–Paul Coffey


Humility is a virtue to be greatly desired by artists. By now we know that no one comes into this world fully formed “from the brow of Zeus,” so to speak. Everyone is formed and developed from childhood through adulthood by innate personality, family, environment, and circumstances. And no matter how aged or seasoned we become, we find out that nobody knows it all. We need to learn the fundamentals, experiment with what works and what doesn’t, and learn from those who have already been there. And after we’ve worked for thousands of hours, our education will reveal a new way—our way—that will send us on the road to greater mastery over what we do. The understanding that we will never “know it all” is the fuel for our own passion to seek further, dig deeper, and create even more accomplished work.

Art is not delivered like the morning paper; it has to be stolen from Mount Olympus.
–Wayne Thiebaud


Seeking, digging, creating: these are “action”-words, suited to astronauts, adventurers, and artists. That “effortless” result we want will come via a ton of work, of trial-and-error experiments, failed forays and launches into the unknown. And it will come with big doses of pain. Have you had the experience of watching gallery-goers come into a room where one of your paintings is installed, and they all walk by it—without even a glance?! You just want to shout across the room, “Hey, that’s my painting! I worked hard on that! You’re not just going to walk right by it, are you?!” I’ve found that perhaps a healthier response is to use that indifference to take more risks, try something different than I’ve been doing, and to use my imagination to–as Francis Schaeffer writes– “fly beyond the stars.” It doesn’t even matter if my artwork appears to be effortlessly-painted, if there is no substantive idea behind it. Joseph Paquet www.joepaquet.com, that masterful artist, advises us in this way: “If you want to be remarked about, be remarkable.”

The object isn’t to make art, it’s to be in that wonderful state which makes art inevitable.
–Robert Henri


Whether you consider yourself to be a professional or amateur, you create art for your own reasons. Some will say that they create art for a living; others will say that they make art to share with others, and to share their appreciation for life; others will confide that they create art as a release from life’s pressures, and to center themselves. All of us would love to get to the level of enjoying it for the experience of doing it, and just not working so hard at it, to “get it right.”

EATON CANYON FALLS
EATON CANYON FALLS

Swimming is like that. I love to swim, and as a near-daily workout I find it to be simultaneously stimulating, relaxing, inspiring, and enjoyable. I have taught swimming and stroke-development, and can attest that every beginner (even those who want to learn) do not take to it “like a fish takes to water.” Some are anxious; some are fearful; some are terrified; and there are those who just want to throw themselves in the pool and work out the mechanics later. None of these attitudes are conducive to mastering swimming skills. There are fundamentals to be introduced, a sequence to learning the skills, trust in the process and self-discipline to be fostered, and mainly a decision to continue until the desired mastery is achieved. The correct state of mind is everything: all who want to learn how to swim can learn to swim. Beyond that, to be competitive, a swimmer will be putting in thousands of yards in the pool. So art is like swimming: it’s easy if you do it right. But how?

I’d like to leave you with some thoughts that I’ve had over my last thirty-five years of painting, in my countless attempts to improve my work, and to perhaps someday achieve that Olympian goal of mastering my medium. We all want to “do it right,” to achieve our visions in and for our painting. I hope this will help someone who is wondering if they will ever be able to swim to the other side. For those who are halfway across the pool, I hope that hearing these again may help to keep us on course.

  • Put away self-doubt, as far as the east is from the west.
    Accept from the outset that you will not do this perfectly.
  • Learn the Basics. Take time to learn from a mentor, to save you wasted hours in the ignorance of tried-and-true practices.
  • Examine your use of time, and set aside time consistently to paint—and DRAW!
  • Say no sometimes.
  • Say yes to painting all of the time!
  • Make a plan to achieve your goal. Write down the steps; make a calendar.
  • Be organized, in your work space, on your palette, in your life.
  • Put in the time to try; and KEEP trying!
  • In your painting, don’t do as much, and as many un-related things.
  • Don’t equate speed, or activity, with efficiency.
  • Don’t include the world in your paintings. Listen to Matt Smith when he says” If you think your painting needs something, leave something out.”
  • DO put down your brushstrokes and leave them there (all of them!)
  • Approach each painting in humility. Leave the world behind. Start anew, above and beyond old baggage. “Create in me a clean heart…and renew a right spirit within me.” Psalm 51.
  • Above all: Play. Appreciate. Wonder. Enjoy.

I send my very best to you, for your best efforts in your best paintings.

“Are We There Yet?!”

Mary Pettis · May 9, 2016 · 11 Comments

Living WatersI recently came across a familiar post saying “When I look at all this beautiful art, I just feel like throwing away my brushes!” I have heard this despair in workshops and on countless occasions from fellow accomplished artists. I would like to speak to this sentiment. We live in a digital age of instant answers. If it takes Siri more than 10 seconds to tell us the information we are searching for, we often become restless. Voices in our heads and partners looking over the shoulder (and the checkbook) express concern if paintings seem to go backwards after a workshop. When will we get there?!
I am as guilty as the next of having “Why bother?” moments of misgivings. Okay. Actually, change the word “moments” to “decades”. After 40 years of painting for a living, I’d like to share a few insights on how to exorcise our doubt; this haunter of our artistic hearts.
1) First of all, trust in the rhythm and unfolding of your life. No one has lived your life. Time spent caring for parents or children or pushing the broom are the things that have made you who you are. You are shaped by your experiences; nothing is ever wasted. Make peace with this. The life you live gives you unique insights and authentic depth. It helps give you something to say beyond the outward appearance of things. In a positive way, you bring it all to the easel. It takes time. Be patient and gentle with yourself. Enjoy the present moment, and leave the rest to a kind universe. Angst only cripples.
North Shore Mantra 2) Remember that all is relative. No matter where you are on this journey, there will always be artists who are better and artists who are worse than you are. Comparing yourself unfavorably with others is not only a downer- it is a distraction that robs you of your clarity. Why allow a beautiful painting to make you sad or insecure? Try to replace judgment and discouragement with inspiration. Be happy for those better artists who show the way. We are all one big family. In spite of this competitive current culture, do not have beating others as your goal. They are not taking your spot at the table. There is room for you, and… a chair with your name on it. Most of the ‘cover artists’ that I admire have this humility, awareness, and sense of perspective.
3) Know the reason WHY you are an artist. If you go beyond the simple answer of superficial fame and fortune, I bet you will find something that comes from a deeper place. Re-examine your artistic aims. Know what stirs and fascinates you. What we discover when we go inward is our poetic response to life. What abstract elements make your heart skip a beat? People want to know how YOU see the world.
Spend more time developing a feeling for your subject on the front end. The deeper you contemplate what is before you, the more you will bring to your viewer. One of my favorite quotes from Emerson is this: “The power in a work of art depends on the depth of the artist’s insight of that object he contemplates.”
4) Keep growing and love the journey.
The legendary cellist Pablo Casals was asked why he continued to practice at age 90. “Because I think I’m making progress,” he replied.
Happy Painting!

The Twelve O’Clock – A Case for Representational Painting in the 21st Century

John Lasater · Apr 25, 2016 · 3 Comments

“Nocturne in Blue and Silver, The Lagoon, Venice”, by James Abbott McNeill Whistler, 1880
“Nocturne in Blue and Silver, The Lagoon, Venice”, by James Abbott McNeill Whistler, 1880

Painting, brushing oil paint onto canvas, is my profession and my passion. I spend my life creating paintings and displaying them in shows where patrons and artists alike pace in variable rhythms. My paintings are what the art world calls representational, meaning its subjects represent reality. And I’m not alone.
Against all odds in this digital age, there appears to be an increase of representational painters “of like nature, chosen by the Gods,” as the artist Whistler put it. Gripped by the desire to paint, we have awakened into a fascinating new world and have come to find that sense of calling holy!
Around the globe, classical painting ateliers are taking root. They are admitting full-time students, some of whom are attending after graduation from university art schools.
Similarly, one-week painting workshops with master artists can be attended in hundreds of venues, hosted by art centers or individuals. I was the beneficiary of four of these master workshops, and now conduct them myself.
And yet, as we painters continue discovering dusty, forgotten art books, we open the sacred pages and wonder, when and why was this lost from the world. Why is it today there is little acknowledgement of representational painting, and a noticeable indifference to painting in general?
Portrait of Whistler by William Merritt Chase, 1885
Portrait of Whistler by William Merritt Chase, 1885

In this essay, I want to take you back in recent art history with me. As you see my opinions on the causes leading to the current state, you might understand better how you can be a part of helping our society nurture artists, and more specifically, painters.
130 years ago, the expatriate American artist, James Abbott McNeill Whistler, gave a lecture that some historians believe was an impetus for the changes in art through the 20th Century. It was called, the “10 O’Clock”. Delivered at 10pm, February 20, 1885 in London, it was one hour long, and was delivered to an audience composed of fashionable Londoners including artists, dealers, and members of the press.
In the lecture, Whistler preached his idea that “as music is the poetry of sound, so is painting the poetry of sight”. He was attempting to elevate painting so that beautiful cadences of brushstrokes and color were worthy of appreciation alone,regardless of any implied narrative or virtue. With this philosophy, an artist might choose to paint a poor beggar over a celebrity, or a dingy street over a grand estate. He might also choose to let the rendering be more naïve in quality. The Impressionists were already painting by that philosophy, but Whistler had the ear of the public, and like a deft lawyer, he made an effective case for it.
 Whistler, remembered today for the portrait of his mother, was also an accomplished landscape painter. “Crepuscule in Flesh Color and Green, Valparaiso” by Whistler, 1866
Whistler, remembered today for the portrait of his mother, was also an accomplished landscape painter. “Crepuscule in Flesh Color and Green, Valparaiso” by Whistler, 1866

The societal expectations set by art writers and critics of the day, were met by Whistler’s simple verbal swords: “Art happens—no hovel is safe from it, no Prince may depend upon it, the vastest intelligence cannot bring it about, and puny efforts to make it universal end in quaint comedy, and coarse farce. This is as it should be—and all attempts to make it otherwise, are due to the eloquence of the ignorant, the zeal of the conceited.” Whistler’s proclamations made the way smooth for generations of artists, but flaws in human nature have a way of repeating themselves.
 
 
 
 
 

Changes to painting in the 20th Century

In the early half of the 20th Century, in the era of Impressionism, Post-Impressionism, Modernism, and beyond, painting was further loosed by the bohemian cry: “art for art’s sake”. From a technical standpoint, elements and principles of design were being severed and reassembled in beautiful new ways, stretching the boundaries of what was considered art. Speculation of purpose was left to the critics.
There are wonderful examples from every period of 20th century art, and a trip to the MOMA in New York will give you a good taste of the diversity and creativity that was unleashed.

 “In the Patio #1”, by Georgia O’Keeffe, 1946
“In the Patio #1”, by Georgia O’Keeffe, 1946

Representational painters adapted to the changing age, thriving on the freedoms afforded by the art for art’s sake philosophy. Some of those were: Charles Hawthorne, Edwin Dickinson, Giorgio Morandi, Albert York, Georgia O’Keeffe, Fairfield Porter, Polly Thayer Starr, Elizabeth Sparhawk-Jones, George Bellows, Edward Hopper, John Sloan, Lois Dodd, David Hockney, Andrew and Jamie Wyeth, Richard Estes, Richard Diebenkorn, Israel Hershberg, and Wolf Kahn.
Some kept traditional veins of impressionism and realism alive, often improving upon their predecessors. Examples can be found in the American West genre artists like Frederick Remington and the California Impressionists like Edgar Payne.
Contemporary representational painters owe their thanks to these artists and many more for essentially keeping painting relevant.
 

Painting in the 20th Century: New Standards, and the Weakening of Craft

At some point in the 20th Century, there was a return to standards, with new and different rules. The art establishment no longer judged the quality of a painting or artist by art for art’s sake. They used a litmus test of conceptual integrity or social awareness.

 A beautiful abstract expressionist painting. “Four Square”, by Franz Kline, 1956
A beautiful abstract expressionist painting. “Four Square”, by Franz Kline, 1956

Western society remained traditional for the most part, and as art became subjective and less representational, abstract expressionist artists were encouraged to justify their work by articulating a deeper purpose. To me this is unfortunate because there were many stunning works, needing no explanation.
You can still see it today, artists and organizations use sophisticated-sounding language to explain philosophies, which comes off subtly farcical.
Listen to this description of a recent painting exhibition in the MOMA: “…each artist engages with painting’s traditions, testing and ultimately reshaping historical strategies like appropriation and bricolage and reframing more metaphysical, high-stakes questions surrounding notions of originality, subjectivity, and spiritual transcendence.”
You can almost hear the echo of Whistler crying, “The people…have been told how they shall love Art, and live with it….Alas! Ladies and gentleman, Art has been maligned. She is…occupied with her own perfection only—having no desire to teach.”
Listen to what Whistler said in his lecture about trying to inject art with virtue: “…people have acquired the habit of looking…not at a picture, but through it, at some human fact, that shall, or shall not, from a social point of view, better their mental or moral state.”
And listen to his thoughts on the writer or critic who: “…degrades Art, by supposing it a method of bringing about a literary climax…. his imagination be appealed to, by a very poor picture…. Meanwhile the painter’s poetry is quite lost to him—the amazing invention, that shall have put form and colour into such perfect harmony, that exquisiteness is the result…”
And finally, listen to this interesting opinion of one of the most celebrated British artists of the 20th Century, from a BBC article called “David Hockney: Why art has become ‘less'”:
…he (Hockney) feels, museums and galleries have jumped too willingly into the unmade bed of conceptual art where lights go on and off in a game of philosophical riddles. But Hockney says “the power is with images”, and in neglecting them the artworld has diminished the very thing it aimed to protect: art.”
One fellow painter put it like this: “Modern art institutions purport that the idea in a work of art is more important than the execution of that idea.” It stands to reason then, craftsmanship in painting has deteriorated for over a century.
 

Painting in the 20th Century: Push for Originality

In 1960, Lucio Fontana displayed an artwork that was simply a slashed canvas. This was about as empty as a canvas could get. “Concetto spaziale attese”, by Lucio Fontana,1960
In 1960, Lucio Fontana displayed an artwork that was simply a slashed canvas. This was about as empty as a canvas could get. “Concetto spaziale attese”, by Lucio Fontana,1960

Today, representational painting is charged with anachronism, yet, the standard of originality was invented just like any of the standards of previous art periods, and consequently is self-defeating in the face of art for art’s sake.
Perhaps where we went wrong was believing originality required such fundamental changes. In many ways art became unrecognizable from nature; from life. Why can’t originality be recognized in the dexterity of a painters hand, or the things regarded or disregarded by their eyes. Fortunately, this is being recognized. A writer expresses it in a recent article this way: “Looking back at art history, aesthetic importance is measured by novelty, by the artist doing something that had never been done before. In our Postmodernist age, “real” originality can be found only in the past, so we have today only its echo. Still, the idea of the unique remains a premiere virtue.” What this admits is that originality is no longer a comprehensive standard.
 

Painting in the 20th Century: Imagination Over Nature

Whistler said in his lecture: “Nature contains the elements, in colour and form, of all pictures, as the keyboard contains all the notes of music”, but at some point in the 20th Century, artists began putting more value on the imagination, sometimes to the degree that nature was ignored altogether.
In a recent article, a writer critiquing a landscape show by Maureen Gallace, said: “…the unspoken assumption of the contemporary art world is that landscape is old-fashioned, a dusty souvenir of the 19th century.” The writer attempted to qualify the work, however, by saying: “Her paintings suggest that she’s spent a lot more time thinking about and looking at paint and paintings than she has thinking about and looking at scenery…(and also that her work is) fundamentally abstract.”
Are we to ignore the impact of the beautiful world around us? Is looking at scenery a deterrent to good art? What is this writer admitting here? There is an inherent nihilism in art and in our culture today. In my opinion, it’s an outright denial of a sentiment deep within our soul.

“Moonlit Cove”, by Albert Pinkham Ryder, early to mid-1880's
“Moonlit Cove”, by Albert Pinkham Ryder, early to mid-1880’s

American artist, Albert Pinkham Ryder (1847-1917), expressed his reaction to nature like this: “…before my eyes framed in an opening between two trees. It stood out like a painted canvas…three solid masses of form and color—sky, foliage and earth—the whole bathed in an atmosphere of golden luminosity. I threw my brushes aside; they were too small for the work in hand. I squeezed out big chunks of pure, moist color, and, taking my palette knife, I laid on blue, green, white, and brown in great sweeping strokes. As I worked, I saw that it was good and clean and strong. I saw nature springing into life upon my dead canvas….Exultantly I painted until the sun sank below the horizon. Then I raced around the fields like a colt let loose and literally bellowed for joy.”
Expressionism, several steps from Impressionism, veered so far from nature and reality that modern American artist, Marsden Hartley eventually tired of it: “Hartley…renounced expressionist art long before it became fashionable to embrace it. In 1928 he wrote that he had spent half his life as an artist obeying William Blake’s injunction to ‘put off intellect and put on imagination; the imagination is the man’….From this doctrinal assertion evolved the theoretical axiom that you don’t see a thing until you look away from it—which was an excellent truism as long as the principles of imaginative life were believed in and followed. I no longer believe in the imagination. I rose one certain day—and the whole thing had become changed. I had changed old clothes for new ones, and I couldn’t bear the sight of the old garments. And when a painting is evolved from imaginative principles I am strongly inclined to turn away because I have greater faith that intellectual clarity is better and more entertaining than imaginative wisdom or emotional richness….I would rather be sure that I had placed two colors in true relationship to each other than to have exposed a wealth of emotionalism gone wrong in the name of richness of personal expression”….Towards the end of his life, Hartley settled once more in Maine; and instead of trying to express his own personality, he devoted himself to the stern beauty of the native landscape.”
“Haystack”, Arthur Dove, 1931
“Haystack”, Arthur Dove, 1931

Even in his personal interpretation of it, modernist Arthur Dove (1880-1946) attributed his inspiration to nature: “I can claim no background except perhaps the woods, running streams, hunting, fishing, camping, the sky.”
Whistler also advocated a personal interpretation of nature: “…the artist is born to pick (from natural elements), and choose, and group with science, these elements, that the result may be beautiful….To say to the painter, that Nature is to be taken as she is, is to say to the player, that he may sit on the piano.”
 

Painting in the 20th Century: Abhorrence of Moralism

Can anyone ascribe morality or amorality to art? Any attempts to do so, and the case for art for art’s sake has taken a blow. Abhorrence of moralism was a driving issue in the 20th Century and many in the art establishment were at war with the traditional values of Western society.

Van Gogh after allegedly slicing his ear off. “Self Portrait with Bandaged Ear”, by Vincent Van Gogh, 1889
Van Gogh after allegedly slicing his ear off. “Self Portrait with Bandaged Ear”, by Vincent Van Gogh, 1889

In Whistler’s lecture he stated, “Let us reassure ourselves, at our own option is our virtue. Art we in no way affect.” In this way he was pleading for the freedom to paint life as it is, the good and the bad alike. Some took this manifesto and turned it against the traditions they saw fit to unravel. The stereotypical bohemian artist was lionized and their moral lapses considered a part of the package.
Listen to N.C. Wyeth’s remarks from a letter in 1919: “The strange and popularly accepted belief that great artists were invariably wayward, and are excused for it on the grounds of special privileges, is as false as it is impossible. No great artist ever thrived on such principles. If stories have been handed down to us of moral lapses in the lives of the masters, their work survives in spite of the mistakes, and not on account of them. No art justifies anything but honest, straightforward living. The moral superiority of Beethoven, the greatest of them all, comes to mind while I write this. Do we hear any of this in the art schools? Decidedly no.” 8
 

Representational painting is in revival

A 2015 article on BBC.com entitled “Is Painting Dead?”, announced with some amusement that: “…the art of painting seems to be thriving.”
The culture will recognize it in time. Those that recognize it now might be invested in paintings of great value in coming generations. Interestingly, art movements are brought about by validation through collection.
From the above article, the author quotes artist RH Quaytman, sore about how collectors and markets can move art history:
“Art fairs, jpegs and the entire bloated art market are responsible for the resurgence of painting as opposed to all other art forms…. I’m sad that it is the structure of the art market that has revalidated and reinvigorated painting.… It’s easy to store, it’s easy to transport, it works well enough on the internet: it turned out that painting was, despite itself, the perfect tool.”

Whistler’s signature “butterfly”, a symbol of his free spirit
Whistler’s signature “butterfly”, a symbol of his free spirit

Painting is an incredible tool. It embodies potential of such poetry and beauty, and the call to master it is never satisfied. As Whistler said in his closing paragraph of the Ten O’Clock lecture: “We have then but to wait—until, with the mark of the gods upon him—there come among us again the chosen—who shall continue what has gone before. Satisfied that, even were he never to appear, the story of the beautiful is already complete….”
Hopefully you have gained from this essay a desire to look at and understand painting with more than a casual interest. You might find your growing admiration is rooted in your own desire to paint. Let yourself be drawn to representational art and become a part of the renaissance.
Whistler started something at 10 O’clock. Well now it’s 12 O’clock…time for a new day in painting.

Sources:
1.) MOMA Website. “The Forever Now: Contemporary Painting in an Atemporal World”. //www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/1455?locale=en
2.) BBC Website. “David Hockney: Why art has become ‘less’”. //www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-165784383
3.) Artspace Website. “Flipping and the Rise of Zombie Formalism”. //www.artspace.com/magazine/contributors/see_here/the_rise_of_zombie_formalism-521844.The Nation Website. “Is Serious Landscape Painting Still Possible?”. //www.thenation.com/article/is-serious-landscape-painting-still-possible/
5.) “Three Hundred Years of American Painting” by Alexander Eliot, Pg 148
6.)“Three Hundred Years of American Painting” by Alexander Eliot, Pg 184
7.) The Art Story Website. “Arthur Dove – Quotes”. //www.theartstory.org/artist-dove-arthur.htm#key_ideas_header
8.)“N.C. Wyeth – Great Illustrations” by Jeff A. Menges, Pg xv.
9.) BBC Website. “Is Painting Dead?”. //www.bbc.com/culture/story/20150217-is-painting-dead
  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 52
  • Page 53
  • Page 54
  • Page 55
  • Page 56
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 80
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission, Policies & Bylaws
    • Board of Directors
    • Presidential History
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • History
    • OPA Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Membership Services
    • Member Login
    • Membership Information
    • State & Province Distribution For Regionals
    • Update Member Information
    • Membership Directory
    • Contact Membership Department
  • Events
    • Exhibitions
    • Online Showcase
    • Lunch and Learn
    • Virtual Museum Road Trip
    • Paint Outs
  • Resources
    • Brushstrokes Newsletters
    • Ship and Insure Info
    • Lunch & Learn Video Archives
    • Museum Road Trip Video Archives
  • Services
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Scholarships
    • Critique Services
    • Workshops
    • Have A HeART Humanitarian Award
  • Online Store
  • Awardees
  • Blog
    • OPA Guest Bloggers
    • Blogger’s Agreement (PDF)
    • Comment Policy
    • Advertisement Opportunities

© 2025 OPA - Oil Painters of America · Design by Steck Insights Web Design Logo